Kousalya vs Kumar

Kousalya vs KUMAR

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 05, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1416394

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1416394
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Dr.Justice R.N.Manjula
Decided On: Jan 05, 2026
Case Number: SA/1224/2009

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kousalya

Respondent

KUMAR

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 05-01-2026coramthe honourable dr.justice r.n.manjula and m.p.no.1 of 20091. kousalya w/o. george anthonysamy no 29-a sakthi vinayakar koil street velankanni mathankadu keevalur tk nagapattinam dist. appellant(s) vs1. kumars/o. packirisamy no 13 sivan mela 2.ramesha w/o. ramakrishnan no 13 sivan mela 3.sathish s/o. ramakrishnan no 13 sivan mela 4.saranya d/o. ramakrishnan no 13 sivan mela respondent(s) prayer: second appeal is filed under section 100 of the cpc to set aside thejudgment and decree passed by the learned district judge, nagapattinam ina.s.no.14 of 2008 dated 17.04.2009, reversing the judgment and decree passed by the learned sub-judge, nagapattinam in o.s.no.57 of 2007 dated 14.03.2009 and to decree the suit in o.s.no.57 of 2007 as prayed for. for appellant(s): no appearance for respondent(s): m/s.r.t.shyamala for r1, r2 and r4 r3 - leftjudgmentwhen the matter was called on 04.12.2025, there was no representation for the appellant. hence, this court ordered the matter to be listed under the caption “for dismissal” after two weeks. even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. hence this court is inclined to dismiss the appeal for default.2. accordingly, this second appeal is dismissed for default. no costs. connected miscellaneous petition is closed. index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no bkn r.n.manjula j. bkn

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05-01-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA and M.P.No.1 of 2009
1. Kousalya W/o. George Anthonysamy No 29-a Sakthi Vinayakar Koil Street Velankanni Mathankadu Keevalur Tk Nagapattinam Dist. Appellant(s) Vs
1. Kumar
S/o. Packirisamy No 13 Sivan Mela 2.Ramesha W/o. Ramakrishnan No 13 Sivan Mela 3.Sathish S/o. Ramakrishnan No 13 Sivan Mela 4.Saranya D/o. Ramakrishnan No 13 Sivan Mela Respondent(s) PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the CPC to set aside the

judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge, Nagapattinam in

A.S.No.14 of 2008 dated 17.04.2009, reversing the judgment and decree passed by the learned Sub-Judge, Nagapattinam in O.S.No.57 of 2007 dated 14.03.2009 and to decree the suit in O.S.No.57 of 2007 as prayed for. For Appellant(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): M/s.R.T.Shyamala for R1, R2 and R4 R3 - Left

JUDGMENT

When the matter was called on 04.12.2025, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, this court ordered the matter to be listed under the caption “For dismissal” after two weeks. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence this Court is inclined to dismiss the appeal for default.

2. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No bkn R.N.MANJULA J. bkn

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Kousalya vs KUMAR Same Judge Honourable Dr.Justice R.N.Manjula