S.Malaivasan Vs M.Baskaran

S.Malaivasan vs M.Baskaran

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 27, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1416116

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1416116
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani
Decided On: Mar 27, 2026
Case Number: CONT P/476/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Malaivasan

Respondent

M.Baskaran

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27.03.2026coram:the hon'ble mr. justice m. dhandapanis. malaivasan .petitioner vs m. basakaran the general manager, administration, puducherry road transport corporation, raja nagar, puducherry. ..respondent prayer: contempt petition filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act, 1971 to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents for having willfully disobeyed the order dated 07.11.2025 in w.p. no.41777 of 2025 passed by this court and punish him under the relevant provisions of the contempt of court act, 1971. for petitioner : mr.m. gnanasekar for respondent : mr.r. sreedhar addl. govt. pleader (pondicherry) -----orderlearned additional government pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that subsequent to enquiry, the charges against the delinquent office have been partially proved and therefore, a warning notice has been issued. he has produced a copy of the proceedings dated 26.03.2026 issued by the respondent to the above effect.2. in view of the above, the contempt petition is closed. however, liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law for claiming subsistence allowance. index : yes / nospeaking order / non-speaking orderneutral citation case : yes / nom. dhandapani, j.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.03.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI
S. Malaivasan .Petitioner Vs M. Basakaran The General Manager, Administration, Puducherry Road Transport Corporation, Raja Nagar, Puducherry. ..Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to initiate Contempt proceedings against the respondents for having willfully disobeyed the order dated 07.11.2025 in W.P. No.41777 of 2025 passed by this Court and punish him under the relevant provisions of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971. For Petitioner : Mr.M. Gnanasekar For Respondent : Mr.R. Sreedhar Addl. Govt. Pleader (Pondicherry) -----

ORDER

Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that subsequent to enquiry, the charges against the delinquent Office have been partially proved and therefore, a warning notice has been issued. He has produced a copy of the proceedings dated 26.03.2026 issued by the respondent to the above effect.

2. In view of the above, the contempt petition is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law for claiming subsistence allowance. Index : Yes / No

Speaking Order / Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation Case : Yes / No

M. DHANDAPANI, J.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties S.Malaivasan vs M.Baskaran Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani