C.Chinnasamy Vs The State Rep. by

C.Chinnasamy vs The State Rep. by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 27, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1414135

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1414135
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose
Decided On: Jan 27, 2026
Case Number: WP/1786/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C.Chinnasamy

Respondent

The State Rep. by

Excerpt

.....advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.4. no prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if a directionis issued to the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s appeal, dated 26.11.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this court, by adhering to the principles of natural justice.5. this court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s appeal dated 26.11.2025.6. for the foregoing reasons, this court directs the 1 st respondentto dispose of the petitioner’s appeal, dated 26.11.2025, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, by adhering to the principles of natural justice. page no.3 of 67. with the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. no costs. 27.01.2026 index : yes / nospeaking order / non-speaking orderneutral citation case : yes/no sp page no.4 of 6 to 1.the commissioner, revenue / land administration department, ezhilagam, chepauk, chennai - 600 005.2.the district collector, erode district, erode - 638 011. 3.the district revenue officer (dro), erode distric, erode - 638 011. 4.the revenue divisional officer (rdo), erode revenue division, erode - 638 011. 5.the revenue thasildhar, office of the thasildhar taluk, 6.the assistant commissioner, zone 1, erode, page no.5 of 6abdul quddhose, j.sp 27.01.2026 page no.6 of 6

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.01.2026
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE C.Chinnasamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State Rep by The Commissioner, Revenue / Land Administration Department, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

2.The District Collector, Erode District, Erode - 638 011. 3.The District Revenue Officer (DRO), Erode Distric, Erode - 638 011. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Erode Revenue Division, Erode - 638 011. 5.The Revenue Thasildhar, Office of the Thasildhar Taluk, Page No.1 of 6 6.The Assistant Commissioner, Zone 1, Erode, Erode District. ... Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to directing the 1st respondent to take action on the appeal dated 26.11.2025 preferred as against the

order dated 25.08.2025 passed by the 3rd respondent within a stipulated

time frame as may be fixed by this Court, preferably within a period of four (4) weeks after duly verifying all relevant and original revenue records including the A-Register and Natham Register, relating to the land comprised in R.S.No.92/6 (Natham Survey No.1505/2) Erode “A” Village, Erode District, Tamil Nadu. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Thirumoorthy For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate *****

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a limited relief. The petitioner seeks for an early disposal of his appeal dated 26.11.2025 pending on the file of the 1st respondent.

2. Aggrieved by the order date 25.08.2025 passed by the 3 rd

respondent, the petitioner had preferred an appeal before the 1 st Page No.2 of 6 respondent on 26.11.2025. Since the said appeal has not been disposed of till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if a direction

is issued to the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s appeal, dated 26.11.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court, by adhering to the principles of natural justice.

5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s appeal dated 26.11.2025.

6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 1 st respondent

to dispose of the petitioner’s appeal, dated 26.11.2025, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, by adhering to the principles of natural justice. Page No.3 of 6

7. With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 27.01.2026 Index : Yes / No

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp Page No.4 of 6 To 1.The Commissioner, Revenue / Land Administration Department, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

2.The District Collector, Erode District, Erode - 638 011. 3.The District Revenue Officer (DRO), Erode Distric, Erode - 638 011. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Erode Revenue Division, Erode - 638 011. 5.The Revenue Thasildhar, Office of the Thasildhar Taluk, 6.The Assistant Commissioner, Zone 1, Erode, Page No.5 of 6

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

sp 27.01.2026 Page No.6 of 6

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties C.Chinnasamy vs The State Rep. by Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose