NEELAMEGAM Vs The State rep. by

Neelamegam vs The State rep. by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1413407

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1413407
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice a.D.Jagadish Chandira
Decided On: Jan 30, 2026
Case Number: CRL OP/1822/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Neelamegam

Respondent

The State rep. by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30.01.2026coram:the hon'ble mr. justice a.d.jagadish chandira and neelamegam ... petitioner vs.1. the state represented by, the inspector of police, (crime no.42 of 2024)2. silambarasan ... respondentsprayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 528 of bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita/section 482 cr.p.c., to call for the records in c.c.no.46 of 2025 pending on the file of the learned judicial magistrate no.ii, jayamkondam and quash the same. for petitioner : mr.c.prabhu for r1 : mr.s.santhosh government advocate (criminal side)orderwhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this court to withdraw this petition and also made an endorsement to that effect. further, he sought the indulgence of this court, to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial court.2. in view of the submission and the endorsement made by thelearned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this criminal original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. however, the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial court is dispensed with, except for receipt of copies, answering the charges, questioning under section 313 cr.p.c., passing of judgment, or any other date as may be required by the trial court. the petitioner shall be duly represented by his counsel before the trial court.neutral citation: yes/no ham to1. the judicial magistrate no.ii, jayamkondam.2. the inspector of police,3. the public prosecutor, high court of madras.a.d.jagadish chandira, j.ham and

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.01.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Neelamegam ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.42 of 2024)
2. Silambarasan ... Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.46 of 2025 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Jayamkondam and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prabhu For R1 : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and also made an endorsement to that effect. Further, he sought the indulgence of this Court, to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court.

2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the

learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. However, the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is dispensed with, except for receipt of copies, answering the charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C., passing of judgment, or any other date as may be required by the trial Court. The petitioner shall be duly represented by his counsel before the trial Court.

Neutral Citation: Yes/No ham To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Jayamkondam.

2. The Inspector of Police,

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

ham and

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Neelamegam vs The State rep. by Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice a.D.Jagadish Chandira