Riyas vs the District Collector

RIYAS vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 22, 2023

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1412507

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1412507
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Viju Abraham
Decided On: Dec 22, 2023
Case Number: RP/1330/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

RIYAS

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

.....divisional office, civil station, wayanad road, eranhippalam, kozhikode, pin - 673020 3 the tahasildar thamarassery taluk office, thamarassery, kozhikode, pin - 673573 4 the agricultural officer unnikulam krishi bhavan, near panchayath office, unnikulam, kozhikode, pin - 673574 5 the director kerala state remote sensing and environment centre, vikas bhavan, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695033 gp - syamanthak b.s.this review petition having come up for admission on 22.12.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: r.p. no. 1330 of 2023 :2viju abraham , j.=========================== r.p. no. 1330 of 2023 ============================ dated this the 22nd day of december, 2023orderthe review petition has been filed on the ground that while preparing the writ petition, some defects have crept in, in the cause title in as much as the address of the 2 nd respondent was wrongly shown. therefore, petitioner seeks to review the judgment to that effect.2. heard the learned government pleader also.3. after hearing both sides, i am inclined to review thejudgment to that extent and permitting the petitioner to correct thecause title of the 2nd respondent as “revenue divisional officer, kozhikode revenue divisional office, civil station, wayanad road, eranhippalam, kozhikode - 673 020”. registry to incorporate necessary corrections in the writ petition as well as in the ledger. it is made clear that the time limit for compliance will start only from the date of production of the order as reviewed. sd/- viju abraham judge sbk/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 1ST POUSHA, 1945 RP NO. 1330 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 40238/2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: RIYAS AGED 47 YEARS S/O. KUNJAHAMMED HAJI, THARIPPAYIL HOUSE, ORKKATTERI, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673501 BY ADVS. FARHANA K.H. AMJATHA D.A. MUHASIN K.M. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CIVIL STATION, WAYANAD ROAD, ERANHIPPALAM, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673020 2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER VADAKARA REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, COURT ROAD, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE (TO BE CORRECTED AS) THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOZHIKODE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, WAYANAD ROAD, ERANHIPPALAM, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673020 3 THE TAHASILDAR THAMARASSERY TALUK OFFICE, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673573 4 THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER UNNIKULAM KRISHI BHAVAN, NEAR PANCHAYATH OFFICE, UNNIKULAM, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673574 5 THE DIRECTOR KERALA STATE REMOTE SENSING AND ENVIRONMENT CENTRE, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 GP - SYAMANTHAK B.S.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.P. No. 1330 of 2023 :2
VIJU ABRAHAM , J.
=========================== R.P. No. 1330 of 2023 ============================ Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2023

ORDER

The review petition has been filed on the ground that while preparing the writ petition, some defects have crept in, in the cause title in as much as the address of the 2 nd respondent was wrongly shown. Therefore, petitioner seeks to review the judgment to that effect.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

3. After hearing both sides, I am inclined to review the

judgment to that extent and permitting the petitioner to correct the

cause title of the 2nd respondent as “Revenue Divisional Officer, Kozhikode Revenue Divisional Office, Civil Station, Wayanad Road, Eranhippalam, Kozhikode - 673 020”. Registry to incorporate necessary corrections in the writ petition as well as in the ledger. It is made clear that the time limit for compliance will start only from the date of production of the order as reviewed. Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sbk/-

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2023 Same Parties RIYAS vs The District Collector Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Viju Abraham