Ridhya a vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 03, 2023

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1411801

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1411801
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice V.G.Arun
Decided On: Jan 03, 2023
Case Number: WP(C)/42860/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ridhya a

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....preferred an appeal, contending that the insufficient space on the stage and sound of the wooden platform had affected the team's performance. the appeal having been rejected by ext.p3, this writ petition is filed.2. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government pleader.3. a perusal of ext.p3 shows that the appealcommittee perused the documents and had found that the stage was built as per the prescription in the kalolsavam manual. the appeal committee also noted the difference of 16 marks between the petitioner's team and the first placed team. -4-4. in view of the conclusive finding in the appealthat the stage was built in accordance with the prescription in the kalolsavam manual and taking into account the difference of 16 marks between the petitioner's team and the first placed team, i refrain from interfering with the impugned order. the writ petition is accordingly dismissed. sd/- v.g. arun judge bpr -5- appendix of wp(c) 42860/2022 petitioner's exhibits exhibit p1 a true copy of the result sheet of 669thiruvathira, hss general competition of kerala school kalolsavam kasargod revenue district 2022-2023. exhibit p2 a true photocopy of the appeal fee remittance receipt dated nil bearing no.101. exhibit p3 a true photocopy of the order of the appeal no.dde k.g.d. 3710/2022/c3 (101) dated 9.12.2022.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 13TH POUSHA, 1944 PETITIONER: RIDHYA A., AGED 13 YEARS (MINOR), D/O.PRAVEENA K., ANGAKALARI HOUSE, BEKKAL P.O., KASARGOD-671 318 REPRESENTED BY MOTHER, PRAVEENA K. BY ADVS. BLAZE K.JOSE URMILA ZACHARIA GOPIKA P. RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2 DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014. 3 DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHINAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 4 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, CIVIL STATION, VIDHYA NAGAR P.O., KASARGOD-671 123. 5 GENERAL CONVENOR, KASARGOD REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2022-2023, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KASARGOD-671 123. -2- 6 THE CHAIRMAN, APPEAL COMMITTEE KERALA SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, KASARGOD DISTRICT 2022-2023, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATION, KASARGOD-671 121. SRI. P.S. APPU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -3-

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2023 The petitioner's team participated for the item Thiruvathira in the Kasaragod District School Kalolsavam and secured 6th place with A Grade. Dissatisfied with the result, the petitioner preferred an appeal, contending that the insufficient space on the stage and sound of the wooden platform had affected the team's performance. The appeal having been rejected by Ext.P3, this writ petition is filed.

2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

3. A perusal of Ext.P3 shows that the appeal

committee perused the documents and had found that the stage was built as per the prescription in the Kalolsavam Manual. The appeal committee also noted the difference of 16 marks between the petitioner's team and the first placed team. -4-

4. In view of the conclusive finding in the appeal

that the stage was built in accordance with the prescription in the Kalolsavam Manual and taking into account the difference of 16 marks between the petitioner's team and the first placed team, I refrain from interfering with the impugned order. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- V.G. ARUN JUDGE bpr -5- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 42860/2022 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE RESULT SHEET OF 669

THIRUVATHIRA, HSS GENERAL COMPETITION OF KERALA SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM KASARGOD REVENUE DISTRICT 2022-2023. Exhibit P2 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPEAL FEE REMITTANCE RECEIPT DATED NIL BEARING NO.101. Exhibit P3 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER OF THE APPEAL NO.DDE K.G.D. 3710/2022/C3 (101) DATED 9.12.2022.

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2023 Same Parties Ridhya a vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice V.G.Arun