Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sibichan, vs Thomas Antony,

Sibichan, vs Thomas Antony,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 14, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1410638

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RP/1287/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sibichan,

Respondent

Thomas Antony,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.nagaresh tuesday, the 14th day of february 2023 / 25th magha, 1944 rp no. 1287 of 2022 against the order in wp(c) 32178/2022 of high court of kerala review petitioners: 1 sibichan, aged 50 years s/o. paulose, kareekkala, 2 pushpalatha, d/o. pankajakshi, amal nivas, b.pramod biju vigneswar aswathi suresh ayyappadas v respondents: 1 thomas antony, aged 48 years, s/o. late. antony, kareekkala thevarkariyil, 2 thannermukkom grama panchayath, alappuzha district, rep.by its secretary., pin - 688527 3 the secretary, thanneermukkom grama panchayath, 4 environmental engineer, kerala state pollution control board, district office, thondankulangara, thathamppally p.o., alappuzha, pin - 688013 5 village officer, kokkothamangalam village, sri.t.jayakrishnan for r1 sri.darsan somanath for r2 sri.t.naveen, sc for r4 smt.k.g.sarojini, government pleader this review petition having come up for admission on 14.02.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:n.nagaresh, j.------------------------------------------------ r.p. no.1287 of 2022 in w.p.(c) no.32178 of 2022 --------------------------------------------------------- dated this the 14th day of february, 2023orderthe counsel for the review petitioner submits that since two writ petitions are pending before this court relating to the same subject matter, the petitioner does not want to prosecute the review petition. accordingly, the review petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- n. nagaresh judge sss appendix of rp 1287/2022 petitioner's annexures annexure a1 true copy of the printout taken from the official web site of the high court of kerala showing the status of w.p ( c) no.annexure a2 true copy of the report dated 08.08.2019 annexure a3 true copy of the report dated 17.06.2021 annexure a4 true copy of the letter dated 07.07.2020issued by the dmo to the panchayat secretary seeking coercive steps.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 25TH MAGHA, 1944 RP NO. 1287 OF 2022 AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C) 32178/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONERS: 1 SIBICHAN, AGED 50 YEARS S/O. PAULOSE, KAREEKKALA, 2 PUSHPALATHA, D/O. PANKAJAKSHI, AMAL NIVAS, B.PRAMOD BIJU VIGNESWAR ASWATHI SURESH AYYAPPADAS V RESPONDENTS: 1 THOMAS ANTONY, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. LATE. ANTONY, KAREEKKALA THEVARKARIYIL, 2 THANNERMUKKOM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY., PIN - 688527 3 THE SECRETARY, THANNEERMUKKOM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, 4 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, THONDANKULANGARA, THATHAMPPALLY P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688013 5 VILLAGE OFFICER, KOKKOTHAMANGALAM VILLAGE, SRI.T.JAYAKRISHNAN FOR R1 SRI.DARSAN SOMANATH FOR R2 SRI.T.NAVEEN, SC FOR R4 SMT.K.G.SAROJINI, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

N.NAGARESH, J.

------------------------------------------------ R.P. No.1287 of 2022 in W.P.(C) No.32178 of 2022 --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of February, 2023

ORDER

The counsel for the review petitioner submits that since two writ petitions are pending before this Court relating to the same subject matter, the petitioner does not want to prosecute the review petition. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- N. NAGARESH JUDGE sss APPENDIX OF RP 1287/2022 PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE PRINTOUT TAKEN FROM THE OFFICIAL WEB SITE OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA SHOWING THE STATUS OF W.P ( C) NO.

Annexure A2           TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 08.08.2019
Annexure A3           TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 17.06.2021
Annexure A4           TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 07.07.2020

ISSUED BY THE DMO TO THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY SEEKING COERCIVE STEPS AGAINST THE POULTRY FARM OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. Annexure A5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 04.05.2022 SENT BY THE DMO TO THE HEALTH MINISTER OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT WHOM THE REVIEW PETITIONER HAD APPROACHED SEEKING REDRESSAL OF HER GRIEVANCE. Annexure A6 TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 27.01.2021 ISSUED BY THE PCB TO THE 1ST Annexure A7 TRUE COPY OF THE CLOSURE NOTICE DATED 25.03.2021 ISSUED BY THE PCB TO THE 1ST Annexure A8 TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 25.01.2022 ISSUED BY THE PCB TO THE 1ST

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial