Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jose Antony vs the Tahsildar

Jose Antony vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Nov 28, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1410444

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/35054/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jose Antony

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice murali purushothaman tuesday, the 28th day of november 2023/7th agrahayana, 1945 wp(c) no. 35054 of 2019 petitioners: 1 jose antony s/o. late antony, kanikathottu (mappilathazhe) 2 jaisy jose, w/o. jose antony, kanikathottu(mappilathazhe) p o, kottayam district - 686 583. 3 bella elsa jose 4 angel theressa jose 5 bliss maria jose p o, kottayam district - 686 583 (minor represented by her mother as her guardian and next friend who is the second petitioner herein)by adv sergi joseph thomas archana suresh respondent: the tahsildar taluk office, changanacherry, pin - 686 101. smt. deep - gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 28.11.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c).no.35054 of 2019judgmentit is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the writ petition is not pressed. accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- murali purushothaman judge spr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023/7TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 35054 OF 2019 PETITIONERS: 1 JOSE ANTONY S/O. LATE ANTONY, KANIKATHOTTU (MAPPILATHAZHE) 2 JAISY JOSE, W/O. JOSE ANTONY, KANIKATHOTTU(MAPPILATHAZHE) P O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 583. 3 BELLA ELSA JOSE 4 ANGEL THERESSA JOSE 5 BLISS MARIA JOSE P O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 583 (MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AS HER GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND WHO IS THE SECOND PETITIONER HEREIN)

BY ADV SERGI JOSEPH THOMAS ARCHANA SURESH RESPONDENT: THE TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE, CHANGANACHERRY, PIN - 686 101. SMT. DEEP - GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.35054 OF 2019

JUDGMENT

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the writ petition is not pressed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SPR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial