Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ria Ren vs State of Kerala

Ria Ren vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 30, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1409189

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/39971/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ria Ren

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....2023judgmentpetitioner has approached this court seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on ext.p2, form 5 application.2. the petitioner is the absolute owner of landhaving a total extent of 38.92 ares comprised in old survey nos.453/1, 453/3 and 1555 in re-sy no.59/2 situated at kanayannur taluk, nadama village, ernakulam district.3. heard the learned government pleader also.after hearing both sides, the above writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2 nd respondent to consider and pass orders on ext.p2 form-5 application in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. it is made clear that the application shall be considered after calling for ksrsec report. sd/- viju abraham, judge pm w.p.(c).no.39971 of 2023 4 appendix of wp(c) 39971/2023 petitioner's exhibits exhibit p1 the true copy of the tax receipt dated respondent to the petitioner exhibit p2 the true copy of the form 5 applicationdated 26/11/2022 under form 5 under rule 4(d) of the kerala conservation of paddy land and wetland rules, 2008 submitted by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent through the 4th respondent

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 39971 OF 2023 PETITIONER: RIA REN, AGED 36 YEARS D/O WREN JOY EAPEN, PALMS VENNIKULAM P.O, MALLAPPALLY PURAMATTOM, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689544 REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER DR. WREN JOY EAPEN, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O JOY EAPEN, PALMS VENNIKULAM P.O, MALLAPPALLY PURAMATTOM, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689544

BY ADVS. ARUN CHAND BEENA N.KARTHA BHARAT VIJAY P. MAJID MUHAMMED K. MINU VITTORRIA PAULSON NEETHU S. VINAYAK G MENON RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, KB JACOB ROAD, FORT KOCHI , ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682001 3 LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE (CONSTITUTED UNDER THE KERALA CONSERVATION OF PADDY LAND AND WETLAND ACT, 2008) REPRESENTED BY THE CONVENER AND AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, 4 THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER 5 THE VILLAGE OFFICER NADAMA VILLAGE OFFICE, POST OFFICE ROAD, THRIPPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682301 W.P.(C).No.39971 of 2023 2

6 KERALA STATE REMOTE SENSING AND ENVIRONMENT CENTRE REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, 1ST FLOOR, VIKAS BHAVAN, NEAR LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA SENATE HOUSE CAMPUS, PMG, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033

OTHER PRESENT: GP - RIYAL DEVASSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).No.39971 of 2023 3 VIJU ABRAHAM,J ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.39971 of 2023 --------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of November, 2023

JUDGMENT

Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2, Form 5 application.

2. The petitioner is the absolute owner of land

having a total extent of 38.92 Ares comprised in Old Survey Nos.453/1, 453/3 and 1555 in Re-Sy No.59/2 situated at Kanayannur Taluk, Nadama Village, Ernakulam District.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

After hearing both sides, the above writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2 nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 Form-5 application in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that the application shall be considered after calling for KSRSEC report. Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM, JUDGE pm W.P.(C).No.39971 of 2023 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 39971/2023 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 5 APPLICATION

DATED 26/11/2022 UNDER FORM 5 UNDER RULE 4(D) OF THE KERALA CONSERVATION OF PADDY LAND AND WETLAND RULES, 2008 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT THROUGH THE 4TH RESPONDENT

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial