Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sabir a vs State of Kerala

Sabir a vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Dec 01, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1406616

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/38459/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sabir a

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran friday, the 1st day of december 2023 / 10th agrahayana, 1945 petitioner: sabir a., aged 43 years s/o e. abdul kharim, thybha, nadayara, varkala p.o, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695145 vishnu bhuvanendran b.anusree abhilash c.v. varun jacob respondents: 1 state of kerala, represented by its secretary to the government, kerala state it mission, government secretariat, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695001 2 district collector, district collectorate civil station, kudappanankkunnu, thiruvananthapuram - 695043 3 the director, kerala state it mission, saankethika, vrindavan gardens, pottakkuzhi, pattom p.o, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695004 4 the director, akshaya state project office, saankethika, 2nd floor, vrindavan gardens, pottakkuzhi, pattom p.o, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695004 5 district project manager akshaya district project office, tc. 25/2146, thyvila, 1st floor, thyvila road near manjalikulam ground, thampanoor, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695001 smt.vidya kuriakose - gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 01.12.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty for his client to challenge the new order produced on record by the learned government pleader, along with the memo dated 24.11.2023. he sought that some protection be granted to his client in the meantime. in the afore circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn; but the interim order granted by this court on 24.11.2023, will continue to be in effect for a further period of two weeks from today. sd/- devan ramachandran judge stu

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 PETITIONER: SABIR A., AGED 43 YEARS S/O E. ABDUL KHARIM, THYBHA, NADAYARA, VARKALA P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695145 VISHNU BHUVANENDRAN B.ANUSREE ABHILASH C.V. VARUN JACOB RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, KERALA STATE IT MISSION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT COLLECTORATE CIVIL STATION, KUDAPPANANKKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695043 3 THE DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE IT MISSION, SAANKETHIKA, VRINDAVAN GARDENS, POTTAKKUZHI, PATTOM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004 4 THE DIRECTOR, AKSHAYA STATE PROJECT OFFICE, SAANKETHIKA, 2ND FLOOR, VRINDAVAN GARDENS, POTTAKKUZHI, PATTOM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004 5 DISTRICT PROJECT MANAGER AKSHAYA DISTRICT PROJECT OFFICE, TC. 25/2146, THYVILA, 1ST FLOOR, THYVILA ROAD NEAR MANJALIKULAM GROUND, THAMPANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE - GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty for his client to challenge the new order produced on record by the learned Government Pleader, along with the memo dated 24.11.2023. He sought that some protection be granted to his client in the meantime. In the afore circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn; but the interim order granted by this Court on 24.11.2023, will continue to be in effect for a further period of two weeks from today. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE stu

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial