Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jolly John vs Anish George

Jolly John vs Anish George

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 10, 2023
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1406200

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Tr.P(C)/786/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jolly John

Respondent

Anish George

Excerpt

.....karthik sha[2022(5) khc 185] and valsal nisha v. rajesh soman nair -:4:- [2020(8) klr 475]. the hon'ble supreme court hasheld that it is the convenience of the woman andchildren that has to be looked into, while ordering the transfer of a case from one court to another.5. in the light of the law laid down in theafore-cited decisions, the uncontroverted pleadings and materials on record, the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that m.c.no.43/2022 & o.p.no.385/2022 are alreadypending before the family court, pala and the respondent is contesting the proceedings there, i am inclined to exercise the discretionary powers of this court under section 24 of the c.p.c. and order the transfer of annexure-a2, so that the cases can be consolidated and jointly tried, which would save judicial time and avoid conflict of decisions.in the result,(i) the transfer petition is allowed, by ordering -:5:- the transfer of o.p.no.847/2022 from the family court, kannur to the family court, pala.(ii) the parties would be at liberty to move the family court, pala and seek for the consolidation and joint trial of all the cases between them.(iii) the registry shall forthwith forward a copy of the order to the family court, kannur with instructions to transmit the records in annexure-a2 to the family court, pala.(iv) the family court, pala shall, immediately onreceipt of the records in annexure-a2, post the case along with m.c.no.43/2022 & o.p.no.385/2022. sd/- c.s.dias,judge dst/10.02.23 //true copy/ p.a.to judge -:6:- appendix petitioner annexures annexure a1 true copy of petition dtd. 03.06.2022 in o.p no. 385 of 2022 of family court, pala annexure a2 true copy of petition dtd. 10.06.2022 in o.p. no. 847 of 2022 of family court, kannur respondent’s exhibits : nil

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 21ST MAGHA, 1944 TR.P(C) NO. 786 OF 2022 IN OP 847/2022 OF FAMILY COURT, KANNUR PETITIONER: JOLLY JOHN AGED 38 YEARS D/O. JOHN, ILLICHIRA HOUSE, MANGALAGIRI, TEEKOY P.O., MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 580 BY ADVS. GEORGE MATHEW M.D.SASIKUMARAN SUNIL KUMAR A.G MATHEW K.T. GEORGE K.V. STEPHY K REGI ADARSH KURIAN RESPONDENT: ANISH GEORGE AGED 44 YEARS , S/O GEORGE , KOROTH HOUSE , EDAVARAMBU P.O., PONPUZHA, TALIPARAMPU TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 511., PIN - 670511 BY ADV BENNY VARGHESE VARGHESE THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:2:- Dated this the 10th day of February, 2023

ORDER

The transfer petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908(in short, 'C.P.C.'), seeking to transfer O.P.No.847/2022 (Annexure-A2), from the Family Court, Kannur to the Family Court, Pala.

2. The petitioner’s case in brief, in the memorandum of transfer petition is that, she is the wife of the respondent. They have a child born in their

wedlock. Their marital relationship is strained. The petitioner has filed O.P.No.385/2022 (Annexure-A1) and M.C.No.43/2022 before the Family Court, Pala, against the respondent, for a decree for restitution of conjugal rights and an order of maintenance for herself and the child. The respondent is contesting the above two proceedings before the Family Court, Pala. Therefore, -:3:- no inconvenience would be caused to him, in Annexure-A2 being transferred. Hence, the transfer petition.

3. Heard; Sri. George Mathew, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Benny Varghese, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

4. The law with respect to transfer of

proceedings, particularly matrimonial disputes, is no longer res integra, in view of the categoric declaration of law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sumitha Sing V. Kumar Sanjay and another [(2001)10 SCC 41)], Mona Aresh Goel V. Aresh Satya Goel [(2000) 9 SCC 255], Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap V. Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap [AIR 2016 SC 3584], Santhini V. Vijaya Venkatesh [2017 (4) KLT 415 (SC)], N.C.V. Aiswarya v. A.S. Sharavana Karthik Sha[2022(5) KHC 185] and Valsal Nisha v. Rajesh Soman Nair -:4:- [2020(8) KLR 475]. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has

held that it is the convenience of the woman and

children that has to be looked into, while ordering the transfer of a case from one Court to another.

5. In the light of the law laid down in the

afore-cited decisions, the uncontroverted pleadings and materials on record, the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that M.C.No.43/2022 & O.P.No.385/2022 are already

pending before the Family Court, Pala and the respondent is contesting the proceedings there, I am inclined to exercise the discretionary powers of this Court under Section 24 of the C.P.C. and order the transfer of Annexure-A2, so that the cases can be consolidated and jointly tried, which would save judicial time and avoid conflict of decisions.

In the result,

(i) The transfer petition is allowed, by ordering -:5:- the transfer of O.P.No.847/2022 from the Family Court, Kannur to the Family Court, Pala.

(ii) The parties would be at liberty to move the Family Court, Pala and seek for the consolidation and joint trial of all the cases between them.

(iii) The Registry shall forthwith forward a copy of the order to the Family Court, Kannur with instructions to transmit the records in Annexure-A2 to the Family Court, Pala.

(iv) The Family Court, Pala shall, immediately on

receipt of the records in Annexure-A2, post the case along with M.C.No.43/2022 & O.P.No.385/2022. Sd/- C.S.DIAS,JUDGE DST/10.02.23 //True copy/ P.A.To Judge -:6:- APPENDIX PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF PETITION DTD. 03.06.2022 IN O.P NO. 385 OF 2022 OF FAMILY COURT, PALA ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF PETITION DTD. 10.06.2022 IN O.P. NO. 847 OF 2022 OF FAMILY COURT, KANNUR RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS : NIL

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial