Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 13TH POUSHA, 1944 (Crime No.710/2022 of Koyilandy Police Station) PETITIONER/S: 1 JASIC ALI AGED 36 YEARS AGED 36 YEARS, S/O ALIKUTTY, KELAMBATH HOUSE, KURUVANGAD P.O, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE , PIN - 673620 2 M K SHAMNAD AGED 33 YEARS S/O ASSAIN AL-IRFAD, MANNARAKKANDY (H), ERANHIKKAL P.O, KOZHIKODE , PIN - 673303 BY ADV T.T.SHANIBA RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682031 , PIN - 682031 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER KOYILANDY POLICE STATION, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT- 673305 , PIN - 673305 OTHER PRESENT: PP SMT.M.K PUSHPALATHA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
======================== B.A.No.9955 of 2022 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of January 2023
ORDER
This is an application seeking regular bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
2. Petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.710/2022
of Koyilandy Police Station, Kozhikode District. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 57 of Kerala Police Act, 2011 initially and then altered into Sections 354A(2), 354D, 109, 363 r/w Section 34 of Indian penal Code, 1860 apart from Section 8 r/w Section 7, Section 12 r/w Section 11(iv)(vi), Section 17 r/w Section 16 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 3(1)(w) & 3(2) (va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
3. According to the prosecution, on 30.10.2022, the accused
kidnapped minor victim aged 17 years in a car without the consent of her guardian and took her to a place called Kokkalloor and thereby committed the offences alleged
4. Smt.T.T.Shaniba, learned Counsel for the petitioners
submitted that the prosecution allegations are false and that the incident as alleged had not occurred. It was further submitted that the petitioners were arrested on 02.11.2022 and they have been in custody since then.
5. Smt.M.K.Pushpalatha, learned Public Prosecutor on the
other hand opposed the grant of bail and submitted that the prosecution allegations are serious and that releasing the petitioner on bail would cause prejudice to the investigation.
6. I have considered the rival contentions.
7. Having regard to the nature of allegations and also the
period of detention already undergone by the petitioners, I am of the view that petitioners ought to be released on bail. Accordingly, this application is allowed on the following conditions:-
(a) Petitioners shall be released on bail on them executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.
(b) Petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required.
(c) Petitioners shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall they tamper with the evidence or contact the victim or her family members.
(d) Petitioners shall not commit any similar offences while they
are on bail. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law, notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this Court. BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE jm/