Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Arya Krishnan vs Nikhil Krishnan

Arya Krishnan vs Nikhil Krishnan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 22, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1405989

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP (FC)/660/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arya Krishnan

Respondent

Nikhil Krishnan

Excerpt

.....to dispose of o.p.(hma) no.412/2020 & o.p.(ors.) no.156/2020) within a time frame decided by this hon’ble court in the interest of justice.(ii) issue such other writ or direction which this honorable court deem fit and proper on the facts and circumstances of the case and interest of justice.”2. petitioner had already submitted an application forexpeditious disposal and as per the case details and the proceeding of the case, the matter is listed for evidence. there is already a judgment by the division bench of this court in shiju joy a. v. nisha, 2021 (2) klt 607 for vindicating the grievance of the affected party for expeditious disposal, wherein the following direction has been issued -" c. advanced hearing: family courts are permitted to depart from the procedure aforenoted on a motion made by a party for early hearing of a case(s) for any justifiable or validreason. if any party desires to move an application for early hearing, he/she shall move the family court at the first instance. the family court shall dispose of such application, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within two weeks from the date of moving such application. it would be open to the family court to pass orders on such applications in the chambers. this court need not entertain any original petitions, filed under article 227 of the constitution of india, for early disposal of cases, unless the parties move the concerned family court at first instance."3. since the application has already been filed, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the petition by directing the trial court/family court to take a call on the application and pass anorder in terms of the judgment extracted above.the o.p(fc) is disposed of as above. sd/- amit rawal judge sd/- c.s. sudha judge nak appendix of op (fc) 660/2023 petitioner exhibits exhibit-p1 true copy of the petition, o.p. (hma) no. before the family court, kottarakkara dated 14.10.2020 exhibit-p1(a) the true english.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP(OTHERS) 156/2020 OF FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA

PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS: 1 ARYA KRISHNAN AGED 31 YEARS POOVANNAL HOUSE, PARAMKODU MURI, ELAMADU VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691520 2 NIYA PILLAI AGED 5 YEARS REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER, THE 1ST PETITIONER, ARYA KRISHNAN, POOVANNAL HOUSE, PARAMKODU MURI, ELAMADU VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691520 BY ADVS. N.MANU THAMPI ABHILASH S.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT: 1 NIKHIL KRISHNAN AGED 37 YEARS NIKHIL NIVAS, PRIYADARSHINI NAGAR, PULAMON MURI, PULAMON P.O., KOTTARAKKARA VILLAGE, 2 UDAYA KUMAR NIKHIL NIVAS, PRIYADARSHINI NAGAR, PULAMON MURI, PULAMON P.O., KOTTARAKKARA VILLAGE, 3 VASANTHA KUMARI NIKHIL NIVAS, PRIYADARSHINI NAGAR, PULAMON MURI, PULAMON P.O., KOTTARAKKARA VILLAGE, 4 NAYANA SARATH CHITHIRA, PADINJATTINKARA MURI, KOTTARAKKARA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691531 THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Amit Rawal, J.

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer. “(I) Direct the Family Court, Kottarakkara to dispose of O.P.(HMA) No.412/2020 & O.P.(Ors.) No.156/2020) within a time frame decided by this Hon’ble Court in the interest of justice.

(ii) Issue such other writ or direction which this Honorable Court deem fit and proper on the facts and circumstances of the case and interest of justice.”

2. Petitioner had already submitted an application for

expeditious disposal and as per the case details and the proceeding of the case, the matter is listed for evidence. There is already a judgment by the Division Bench of this Court in Shiju Joy A. v. Nisha, 2021 (2) KLT 607 for vindicating the grievance of the affected party for expeditious disposal, wherein the following direction has been issued -

" C. ADVANCED HEARING: Family Courts are permitted to depart from the procedure aforenoted on a motion made by a party for early hearing of a case(s) for any justifiable or valid

reason. If any party desires to move an application for early hearing, he/she shall move the Family Court at the first instance. The Family Court shall dispose of such application, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within two weeks from the date of moving such application. It would be open to the Family Court to pass orders on such applications in the chambers. This court need not entertain any Original Petitions, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for early disposal of cases, unless the parties move the concerned Family Court at first instance."

3. Since the application has already been filed, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the petition by directing the trial court/family court to take a call on the application and pass an

order in terms of the judgment extracted above.

The O.P(FC) is disposed of as above. Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE Sd/- C.S. SUDHA JUDGE nak APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 660/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION, O.P. (HMA) NO. BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA DATED 14.10.2020 Exhibit-P1(a) THE TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT- P1 Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION, O.P. (ORS) NO. PETITIONERS BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA DATED 18.06.2020 Exhibit-P2(a) THE TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT- P2 Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT & PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS DATED 20.10.2023 Exhibit-P3(a) THE TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE EXHIBIT-P3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial