Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Subhash vs State of Kerala

Subhash vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 31, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1405891

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/38434/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Subhash

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran wednesday, the 31st day of may 2023 / 10th jyaishta, 1945 petitioner/s: 1 subhash, aged 52 years, s/o.bhaskaran pillai, residing at 'indhubham', 2 rama k.nair, aged 42 years, w/o.subhash, 'indhubham', by advs.sri.p.haridas smt.divya k.nair sri.renji george cherian smt.roshin mariam jacob sri.p.c.shijin respondents: 1 state of kerala, represented by secretary to government, department of public works, government secretariat,2 food safety commissioner, 3 tahasildar, taluk office, 4 executive engineer, kerala public works department (bridges & roads), 5 asst. executive engineer, pwd, mannar, alappuzha district, pin 689 623. -2- 6 mannar grama panchayat, represented by its secretary, pin - 689 623. 7 sri.g.radhakrishnan, thekkeparampil, kuttemperoor p.o., mannar, pin - 689623. by advs.sri.r.gireesh varma sri.v.k.nandakumaran sri.v.venugopal, gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 31.05.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: -3-judgmentit is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that this writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time and that his clients are not pressing the same. this writ petition is, therefore, closed as having become infructuous. sd/- devan ramachandran judge akv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2023 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1945 PETITIONER/S: 1 SUBHASH, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.BHASKARAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT 'INDHUBHAM', 2 RAMA K.NAIR, AGED 42 YEARS, W/O.SUBHASH, 'INDHUBHAM', BY ADVS.SRI.P.HARIDAS SMT.DIVYA K.NAIR SRI.RENJI GEORGE CHERIAN SMT.ROSHIN MARIAM JACOB SRI.P.C.SHIJIN RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,

2 FOOD SAFETY COMMISSIONER, 3 TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, 4 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (BRIDGES & ROADS), 5 ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD, MANNAR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN 689 623. -2- 6 MANNAR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 689 623. 7 SRI.G.RADHAKRISHNAN, THEKKEPARAMPIL, KUTTEMPEROOR P.O., MANNAR, PIN - 689623. BY ADVS.SRI.R.GIREESH VARMA SRI.V.K.NANDAKUMARAN SRI.V.VENUGOPAL, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -3-

JUDGMENT

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that this writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time and that his clients are not pressing the same. This writ petition is, therefore, closed as having become infructuous. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE akv

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial