Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jithesh.K, Vs The Commissioner

Jithesh.K, vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 22, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1405517

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/37870/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jithesh.K,

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

.....22.12.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe petitioner states that he was engaged temporarily as a clerk in the nalussery bhagavathy devaswom. while so, a selection process was conducted for the post of clerk, and the petitioner secured rank no.2 as is borne out from ext.p1 ranked list. he asserts that there is a vacancy with effect from 01.11.2023. in the said circumstances, the petitioner is stated to have submitted ext.p3 representation before the 2nd respondent to appoint the petitioner against the said vacancy. the grievance of the petitioner is that no action has been taken on ext.p3 to date.2. though notice was issued on the 2nd respondent and the same was served, there is no appearance.3. having regard to the facts and circumstances and thesubmissions made across the bar, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to expeditiously consider ext.p3 in the light of ext.p1 and take a decision within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. until orders are passed, the interim order dated 15.11.2023 shall continue. sd/- raja vijayaraghavan v, judge ns appendix of wp(c) 37870/2023 petitioner’s exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the rank list published by the 2 nd respondent dated 27/10/2023. exhibit p2 true copy of the decision of the trustee board dated 27/10/2023. exhibit p3 true copy of the representation submitted by the petitioner which was received by the 2 nd respondent dated 11/11/2023.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 1ST POUSHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 37870 OF 2023 PETITIONER: JITHESH.K, AGED 28 YEARS S/O. HARIKRISHNAN, KANHIRATHINKAL HOUSE, ELAMBULASSERY PO, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678595. BY ADVS. K.MOHANAKANNAN D.S.THUSHARA RESPONDENTS: 1 THE COMMISSIONER MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, OFFICE OF THE MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, HOUSEFED COMPLEX, ERANJIPALAM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673003. 2 THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NALUSSERI BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM, ELAMBULASSERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678595. SRI. R LAKSHMI NARAYAN, SC FOR MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The petitioner states that he was engaged temporarily as a Clerk in the Nalussery Bhagavathy Devaswom. While so, a selection process was conducted for the post of Clerk, and the petitioner secured rank No.2 as is borne out from Ext.P1 ranked list. He asserts that there is a vacancy with effect from 01.11.2023. In the said circumstances, the petitioner is stated to have submitted Ext.P3 representation before the 2nd respondent to appoint the petitioner against the said vacancy. The grievance of the petitioner is that no action has been taken on Ext.P3 to date.

2. Though notice was issued on the 2nd respondent and the same was served, there is no appearance.

3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and the

submissions made across the Bar, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to expeditiously consider Ext.P3 in the light of Ext.P1 and take a decision within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Until orders are passed, the interim order dated 15.11.2023 shall continue. Sd/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE NS APPENDIX OF WP(C) 37870/2023 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RANK LIST PUBLISHED BY THE 2 ND RESPONDENT DATED 27/10/2023. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE TRUSTEE BOARD DATED 27/10/2023. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER WHICH WAS RECEIVED BY THE 2 ND RESPONDENT DATED 11/11/2023.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial