Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

XX XX XX XX vs State of Kerala

XX XX XX XX vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Dec 01, 2023
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1405201

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./10230/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

XX XX XX XX

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....to get bail. on the other hand, the learned public prosecutors submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.6. the applicant was arrested on 06.09.2023. since then,he is in judicial custody. a perusal of the case diary would reveal that the accusation against the applicant is very serious, and it prima facie shows a premeditated criminal act on his part. altogether four cases were filed against him. the allegations are similar in nature. in one case, he was given statutory bail. the:6:victims involved in all the cases are minors aged 13 years who were staying in the hostel away from their home. the applicant is also the warden of the hostel. the applicant who is supposed to take care of the hostelmates sexually exploited them. the allegation is serious in nature. the investigation is still going on.considering the nature of the crime, how the applicant is alleged to have complicity in it, and the facts and circumstances mentioned above, i am of the view that the applicant cannot be released on bail at this stage. the bail applications are accordingly dismissed. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge sbk/-

Full Judgment

BAIL APPL. NO. 10230 OF 2023 CRIME NO.881/2023 OF Narakkal Police Station, Ernakulam RESPONDENT: REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 VIPIN NARAYAN A, G.SUDHEER,NOUSHAD K A-PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.12.2023, ALONG WITH Bail Appl..10233/2023 & 10235/2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

:2: BAIL APPL. NO. 10233 OF 2023 CRIME NO.883/2023 OF Narakkal Police Station, Ernakulam RESPONDENTS: REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 PP - VIPIN NARAYANAN R. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.12.2023, ALONG WITH Bail Appl.10230/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: :3: BAIL APPL. NO. 10235 OF 2023 CRIME NO.889/2023 OF Narakkal Police Station, Ernakulam RESPONDENT: REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 PP - G. SUDHEER THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.12.2023, ALONG WITH Bail Appl..10230/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: :4:

ORDER

All the above bail applications are filed u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2. The accused in all the bail applications is one and the

same. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime Nos. 881, 883 & 889 of 2023 of Njarakkal Police Station. In Crime No. 881/2023, the offences alleged are punishable under Sections 4(2), 3(C), 6, 5(f), (l) (p), 8, 7, 10, 9(f), (l) (p) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. In Crime No. 883/2023, the offences alleged are punishable under Sections 4(2), 3(c), 6, 5(f), 5(l), 7, 10 read with 9(l) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. In Crime No. 889/2023, the offences alleged are punishable under Sections 7, 8, 9, 9(f), 9(p) and 9(o) read with 10 of POCSO Act.

3. The prosecution case in short is as follows: The accused

is an Instructor (Ustad) of the Madrassa attached with Masjidul Malik Masjid, Kaloor. The victims are his students. The allegation in Crime No.881/2023 is that the accused sexually abused the victim at the bedroom of the child by kissing and hugging him and also pressing and shaking his penis. It is also alleged that the accused forced the victim to shake his penis. The allegation in Crime No.883/2023 is that the accused committed penetrative sexual assault on a boy

:5: aged 13 years staying in the hostel. The allegation in Crime No.889/2023 is that the accused sexually abused a child who is also an inmate in the hostel on 11.08.2023 at 10.30 p.m in the hostel room by fondling the buttocks of the child and touching his penis on his backside.

4. I have heard Sri. Samsudin Panolan, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. Noushad K.A, Sri. Vipin Narayanan & Sri. G.Sudheer, the learned Public Prosecutors. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the

applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crimes; hence, he is entitled to get bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutors submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was arrested on 06.09.2023. Since then,

he is in judicial custody. A perusal of the case diary would reveal that the accusation against the applicant is very serious, and it prima facie shows a premeditated criminal act on his part. Altogether four cases were filed against him. The allegations are similar in nature. In one case, he was given statutory bail. The

:6:

victims involved in all the cases are minors aged 13 years who were staying in the hostel away from their home. The applicant is also the warden of the hostel. The applicant who is supposed to take care of the hostelmates sexually exploited them. The allegation is serious in nature. The investigation is still going on.

Considering the nature of the crime, how the applicant is alleged to have complicity in it, and the facts and circumstances mentioned above, I am of the view that the applicant cannot be released on bail at this stage. The bail applications are accordingly dismissed. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE sbk/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial