Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2023 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1945 PETITIONERS: 1 C.HAMSA, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.C.BAVA, CHOORAPULACKAL HOUSE, RANDATHANI P.O., MALAPPURAM-676 510. 2 MUHAMMED KUTTY, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.AHAMMED, CHANGARANCHOLA, KALLUVETTUPARA, EDARIKKODU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 501.
3 TAJUDEEN, S/O.HASSAINAR, THAIKKADAN HOUSE, CHERUSOLA P.O., 4 ABDUL RAZAK, S/O.RAYIMU, CHANGARAMCHOLA, CHERUSOLA P.O., 5 ABDU SALAM, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.ISMAIL, CHANGARAMCHOLA, CHERUSOLA P.O., 6 ABDU RAHMAN, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.KOYA MUSALIAR, VALLUKUNNAM HOUSE, CHERUSOLA P.O., 7 MOIDEEN, AGED 76 YEARS, S/O.KUNJAHAMMED HAJI, KAZHUNGIL, EDARIKKODE, 8 SUHRABI, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O.ABU, MANGADAN HOUSE, EDARIKKODE, 9 ALIKKUTTY, AGED 65 YEARS,S/O.ALAVIKUTTY, KAZHUNGIL, EDARIKKODE, MALAPPURAM - 676 501. 10 MUHAMMED HAJI, AGED 75 YEARS, S/O.ALIMUSLIAR, THUMBATHU HOUSE, EDARIKKODE, MALAPPURAM -676 501.
P.A.MOHAMMED SHAH shri.MUHAMMED JANAISE V. SHRI.ASWIN KUMAR M J SHRI.MOHAMED MUSTHAFA A.K. SMT.HELEN P.A. SRI.SHAHIR SHOWKATH ALI RESPONDENTS: 1 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3 NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, G-586, SECTOR -10, DWARAKA, NEW DELHI-110 075, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 4 THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, VII/511 B, NEITHELI-MAVELIPURAM ROAD, MAVELIPURAM, KAKKANAD,KERALA-682 030. 5 SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY,LAND ACQUISITION, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, MALAPPURAM-676 504. SMT.I. SHEELA DEVI, CGC DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.) SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.S.VIBHEESHANAN SRI.K.SUDHINKUMAR SRI.S.K.ADHITHYAN SRI.SABU PULLAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the writ petition has become infructuous. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK