Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 10TH CHAITHRA, 1945 TR.P(C) NO. 761 OF 2022 IN OP 525/2022 OF FAMILY COURT, OTTAPPALAM PETITIONER: VEENA VENUGOPAL AGED 30 YEARS D/O. VENUGOPALAN, SAYYOJYAM HOUE, VALLIKAPATTA POST, MANKADA, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679324 BY ADV E.C.AHAMED FAZIL RESPONDENT: SANDEEPAN AGED 35 YEARS S/O. GOPALAN, BHOOMIJA HOUSE, KOOTANAD POST, VATTENNAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679533 THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: :2: Dated this the 31stday of March, 2023
ORDER
The transfer petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908(in short, 'C.P.C.'), seeking to transfer O.P.No.525/2022(Annexure-A1) from the Family Court, Ottapalam to the Family Court, Malappuram.
2. The petitioner’s case, in brief, in the
memorandum of transfer petition is that, she is the wife of the respondent. The marital relationship is strained. The petitioner has filed O.P.No.1122/2022 (Annexure-A2) before the Family Court, Malappuram, against the respondent, for a decree of restitution of conjugal rights. The respondent is contesting the proceeding before the said court. Therefore, no inconvenience would cause to him, in Annexure-A1 being transferred. Hence, the transfer petition.
:3:
3. Heard; Sri. E.C.Ahamed Fazil, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Even though notice has been served on the respondent, there is no appearance for him
4. The law with respect to transfer of
proceedings, particularly matrimonial disputes, is no longer res integra, in view of the categoric declaration of law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sumitha Sing V. Kumar Sanjay and another [(2001)10 SCC 41)], Mona Aresh Goel V. Aresh Satya Goel [(2000) 9 SCC 255], Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap V. Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap [AIR 2016 SC 3584], Santhini V. Vijaya Venkatesh [2017 (4) KLT 415 (SC)], N.C.V. Aiswarya v. A.S. Sharavana Karthik Sha[2022(5) KHC 185] and Valsal Nisha v. Rajesh Soman Nair [2020(8) KLR 475]. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that it is the convenience of the woman and children that has to be
:4: looked into, while ordering the transfer of a case from one Court to another.
5. In the light of the law laid down in the
afore-cited decisions, the uncontroverted pleadings and materials on record and the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that Annexure-A2 is already pending before the Family Court, Malappuram, and the respondent is contesting the proceeding before the said court, I am inclined to exercise the discretionary powers of this Court under Section 24 of the C.P.C. and order the transfer of Annexure-A1, so that the cases can be consolidated and jointly tried by the same court, which would save precious judicial time and avoid conflict of decisions.
In the result, I allow the transfer petition as follows:
(i) O.P.No.525/2022 is transferred from the Family Court, Ottapalam to the Family Court, Malappuram. :5:
(ii) The parties would be at liberty to move the Family Court, Malappuram and seek for the consolidation and joint trial of all the cases between them.
(iii) The Registry shall forthwith forward a copy of the order to the Family Court, Ottapalam with instructions to transmit the records in Annexure-A1 to the Family Court, Malappuram.
(iv) The Family Court, Malappuram shall,
immediately on receipt of the records in Annexure-A1, post the case along with Annexure-A2. Sd/- C.S.DIAS,JUDGE DST/31.03.2023 //True copy/ P.A.To Judge :6: APPENDIX PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF O.P. NO. 525 OF 2022 ON THE FILES OF FAMILY COURT, OTTAPALAM DATED 05.03.2022 Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF O.P. NO. 1122 OF 2022 ON THE FILES OF FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM DATED 12.10.2022 RESPONDENTS’ EXHIBITS: NIL