Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Usman Aboobacker vs State of Kerala

Usman Aboobacker vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 03, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1402972

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(Crl.)/838/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Usman Aboobacker

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....on bail till the suspension petition is considered by the appellate court.2. heard counsel for the petitioner and the public prosecutor. no notice is necessary to the complainant because of the way in which this original petition is going to be disposed of.3. it is an admitted fact that the petitioner was convictedand sentenced by the trial court and an appeal is filed with delay o.p(crl) 838/2023 3 condonation petition. it is also an admitted fact that, based on the execution warrant, the petitioner is arrested and he is undergoing the sentence. it is also an admitted fact that the petitioner was convicted under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act.4. considering the facts and circumstances of the case andin the interest of justice, i think, the sentence can be suspended by this court invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction under article 227 of the constitution for a period of two months on condition that the petitioner will deposit 20% of the fine amount before the trial court. therefore, this o.p(crl.) is disposed of with the following directions:a) the sentence imposed on the petitioner is suspended for a period of two months on condition that the petitioner will execute a bond for rs.50,000/- [rupees fifty thousand only] with two solvent sureties to the like sum each to the satisfaction of the trial court. the petitioner will also pay 20% of the fine amount before the trial court. if the bond is executed and the amount is paid, the petitioner shall be released on bail. b) the additional district & sessions court, muvattupuzha will dispose the delay petition and the suspension petition in the criminal appeal filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible.o.p(crl) 838/2023 4 c) i make it clear that the sessions court is free to pass appropriate orders in the delay petition and suspension petition in accordance to law untrammelled by any observation in this judgment. sd/- p. v. kunhikrishnan judge sbna/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 12TH KARTHIKA, 1945 OP(CRL.) NO. 838 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRA 296/2023 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT,MUVATTUPUZHA ST 1231/2018 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PIRAVOM PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED: USMAN ABOOBACKER, AGED 51 YEARS S/O ABOOBACKER, KARIYAMBATH HOUSE, PULLOKARA PO,CHOKLI,THALASSERY, PIN - 670678 BY ADV K.REEHA KHADER RESPONDENTS:

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 SHO, CHOKLI POLICE STATION, PIN - 670672 3 SUBHAGHAN, AGED 71 YEARS, S/ RAGHAVAN,KAVUNGAL HOUSE,MARITHAZHAM PO, PIN - 682315 OTHER PRESENT: SRI.M.P.PRASANTH, PP THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P(Crl) 838/2023 2

P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

O.P(Crl). No.838 of 2023 Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2023

JUDGMENT

The petitioner was convicted by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Piravom in S.T.No.1231/2018. The petitioner filed an appeal before the Additional District & Sessions Court, Muvattupuzha along with a delay condonation petition. In the delay petition, notice is ordered by the appellate court and the appeal is posted for return of notice. In the meanwhile, the petitioner was arrested based on the execution warrant. The prayer in this Original Petition is to release the petitioner on bail till the suspension petition is considered by the appellate court.

2. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor. No notice is necessary to the complainant because of the way in which this Original Petition is going to be disposed of.

3. It is an admitted fact that the petitioner was convicted

and sentenced by the trial court and an appeal is filed with delay O.P(Crl) 838/2023 3 condonation petition. It is also an admitted fact that, based on the execution warrant, the petitioner is arrested and he is undergoing the sentence. It is also an admitted fact that the petitioner was convicted under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and

in the interest of justice, I think, the sentence can be suspended by this Court invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution for a period of two months on condition that the petitioner will deposit 20% of the fine amount before the trial court. Therefore, this O.P(Crl.) is disposed of with the following directions:

a) The sentence imposed on the petitioner is suspended for a period of two months on condition that the petitioner will execute a bond for Rs.50,000/- [Rupees Fifty Thousand Only] with two solvent sureties to the like sum each to the satisfaction of the trial court. The petitioner will also pay 20% of the fine amount before the trial court. If the bond is executed and the amount is paid, the petitioner shall be released on bail. b) The Additional District & Sessions Court, Muvattupuzha will dispose the delay petition and the suspension petition in the criminal appeal filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible.

O.P(Crl) 838/2023 4 c) I make it clear that the Sessions Court is free to pass appropriate orders in the delay petition and suspension petition in accordance to law untrammelled by any observation in this judgment. Sd/- P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE Sbna/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial