Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pramod vs State of Kerala

Pramod vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 30, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1402959

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/9227/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pramod

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....alleging commission of offences punishable under sections 498a, 506 (ii) and 323 of the indian penal code.2. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wouldsubmit that the entire issues between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent (the de facto complainant) have been settled. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also refers to annexure-a3 notarized affidavit executed by the 2 nd respondent to establish that the entire issues between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent have been settled and the 2 nd respondent does not intend to continue with the proceedings against the petitioner.3. learned senior public prosecutor and the learnedcounsel appearing for the 2nd respondent confirm that the entire disputes between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent have been settled and that the 2nd respondent does not wish to continue with the proceedings against the petitioner.4. having heard the learned counsel appearing for the crl.mc no. 9227 of 2023 3petitioner, learned senior public prosecutor and the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent, i am of the view that this crl.m.c. can be allowed on the ground of settlement. there is no public interest involved in continuing the proceedings against the petitioner. therefore, in exercise of the jurisdiction vested in this court under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, further proceedings against the petitioner can be quashed on the ground of settlement. accordingly, the crl.m.c is allowed and all further proceedings in c.c.no.971/2023 on the file of the judicial first class magistrate court-i, cherthala (arising out of crime no.585/2023 of pattanakkad police station, alappuzha district) will stand quashed as against the petitioner.sd/- gopinath p. judge ats crl.mc no. 9227 of 2023 4 appendix of crl.mc 9227/2023 petitioner’s annexures annexure-a1 the true copy of the f.i.r. dated 20-06-2023 in crime no.585/2023 of pattanakkad police station, alappuzha annexure -a2 the certified copy of the.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 9227 OF 2023 CRIME NO.585/2023 OF PATANAKKAD POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA IN 971/2023 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I, CHERTHALA

PETITIONER/ACCUSED: PRAMOD AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.SARASAPPAN, BY ADV M.S.BREEZ RESPONDENTS/STATE/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 031. 2 SANGEETHA AGED 39 YEARS, W/O.PRAMOD, BY ADVS. SRI NOUSHAD K.A. (SR PP) SRI. K.R.RAJKUMAR (FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.MC NO. 9227 OF 2023 2

ORDER

Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.585/2023 of Pattanakkad Police Station, Alappuzha district, which is now pending as C.C.No.971/2023 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Cherthala, alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A, 506 (ii) and 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would

submit that the entire issues between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent (the de facto complainant) have been settled. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also refers to Annexure-A3 notarized affidavit executed by the 2 nd respondent to establish that the entire issues between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent have been settled and the 2 nd respondent does not intend to continue with the proceedings against the petitioner.

3. Learned Senior Public Prosecutor and the learned

counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent confirm that the entire disputes between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent have been settled and that the 2nd respondent does not wish to continue with the proceedings against the petitioner.

4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the CRL.MC NO. 9227 OF 2023 3

petitioner, learned Senior Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent, I am of the view that this Crl.M.C. can be allowed on the ground of settlement. There is no public interest involved in continuing the proceedings against the petitioner. Therefore, in exercise of the jurisdiction vested in this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, further proceedings against the petitioner can be quashed on the ground of settlement. Accordingly, the Crl.M.C is allowed and all further proceedings in C.C.No.971/2023 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Cherthala (arising out of Crime No.585/2023 of Pattanakkad Police Station, Alappuzha district) will stand quashed as against the petitioner.

Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE ats CRL.MC NO. 9227 OF 2023 4 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 9227/2023 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES Annexure-A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.R. DATED 20-06-2023 IN CRIME NO.585/2023 OF PATTANAKKAD POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA Annexure -A2 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 25-07-2023 ALONG WITH THE STATEMENT OF WITNESSES IN CRIME NO.585/2023 OF PATTANAKKAD POLICE STATION Annexure -A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT DATED 27-10-2023 SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial