Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vrinda vs State of Kerala

Vrinda vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 31, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1401883

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/9058/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vrinda

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....following: crl.mc no.9058 of 2023 2orderthis crl.m.c has been filed seeking a direction to the judicial first class magistrate court, north paravur, to consider any bail application that may be filed by the petitioner on the date of surrender.2. petitioner is the 2nd accused in crime no.988/2023 ofnorth paravur police station, ernakulam district. the allegation against the petitioner is that she along with the 1 st accused (who is stated to be the managing director of a company called ‘kottolas group of business’) approached the defacto complainant and received an amount of rs.32,000/- under the pretext that they will arrange license for export business and for that purpose theyreceived the said amount from the defacto complainant. the allegation against the petitioner, who is the 2 nd accused is that the petitioner/2nd accused aided the 1st accused in the commission of the crime.3. heard the learned senior public prosecutor also. having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned senior public prosecutor and having regard to the limited nature of relief sought for by the petitioner, this crl.m.c. will stand disposed of directing that if the petitioner surrenders before crl.mc no.9058 of 2023 3the judicial first class magistrate court, north paravur, on or before 10-11-2023, any bail application filed by the petitioner shall be considered by that court on the same day. the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with crime no.988/2023 of north paravur police station, ernakulam district, till 10-11-2023.sd/- gopinath p. judge ats crl.mc no.9058 of 2023 4 appendix of crl.mc 9058/2023 petitioner’s annexures annexure a annexure a photo copy of fir dated

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 9TH KARTHIKA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 9058 OF 2023 CRIME NO.988/2023 OF NORTH PARAVUR POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2: VRINDA AGED 40 YEARS, D/O. GOPI, PUTHUKKAD HOUSE, SOUTH PARAVOOR P.O., UDAYAMPEROOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682 307. BY ADVS. P.M.HABEEB YESMA D. ELAVANTHARA AKHILA JOSEPH SILPA V. CHANDRAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM (THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER,NORTH PARAVUR), PIN - 682 031. BY ADV. SRI NOUSHAD K.A. (SR PP) THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.MC NO.9058 OF 2023 2

ORDER

This Crl.M.C has been filed seeking a direction to the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, North Paravur, to consider any bail application that may be filed by the petitioner on the date of surrender.

2. Petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No.988/2023 of

North Paravur Police Station, Ernakulam district. The allegation against the petitioner is that she along with the 1 st accused (who is stated to be the Managing Director of a company called ‘Kottolas Group of Business’) approached the defacto complainant and received an amount of Rs.32,000/- under the pretext that they will arrange license for export business and for that purpose they

received the said amount from the defacto complainant. The allegation against the petitioner, who is the 2 nd accused is that the petitioner/2nd accused aided the 1st accused in the commission of the crime.

3. Heard the learned Senior Public Prosecutor also. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Senior Public Prosecutor and having regard to the limited nature of relief sought for by the petitioner, this Crl.M.C. will stand disposed of directing that if the petitioner surrenders before Crl.MC NO.9058 OF 2023 3

the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, North Paravur, on or before 10-11-2023, any bail application filed by the petitioner shall be considered by that Court on the same day. The petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with Crime No.988/2023 of North Paravur Police Station, Ernakulam district, till 10-11-2023.

Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE ats Crl.MC NO.9058 OF 2023 4 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 9058/2023 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES Annexure A ANNEXURE A PHOTO COPY OF FIR DATED

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial