Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajeesh Kumar vs State of Kerala

Ajeesh Kumar vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 17, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1401643

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/8413/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajeesh Kumar

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a. badharudeen tuesday, the 17th day of january 2023 / 27th pousha, 1944 crime no.766 of 2022 of pulpally police station petitioner/accused: ajeesh kumar s/o.mohanan, aged 41 years, kunnel house, mullankolly, iripood, padchira wayanad, pin - 673579 by advs. cherian mathew poothicote ajith villy george george g.poothicote respondent/state: the state of kerala, represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam - pin - 682031 sri.g.sudheer, public prosecutor this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 17.01.2023, the court on the same day passed the following:orderdated this the 17th day of january, 2023 the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the matter, after arguing for a while to establish that fir in crime no.766/2022 of pulpally police station alleging commission of offence under section 55(i) of the kerala abkari act and section 118(i) of the kerala police act, is liable to be quashed, since he failed to substantiate quashment as sought for. permission granted. therefore, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. as such the investigation shall go on. sd/- a. badharudeen judge nkr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 27TH POUSHA, 1944 CRIME NO.766 OF 2022 OF PULPALLY POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED: AJEESH KUMAR S/O.MOHANAN, AGED 41 YEARS, KUNNEL HOUSE, MULLANKOLLY, IRIPOOD, PADCHIRA WAYANAD, PIN - 673579 BY ADVS. CHERIAN MATHEW POOTHICOTE AJITH VILLY GEORGE GEORGE G.POOTHICOTE RESPONDENT/STATE: THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - PIN - 682031 SRI.G.SUDHEER, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 17th day of January, 2023 The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the matter, after arguing for a while to establish that FIR in crime No.766/2022 of Pulpally police station alleging commission of offence under Section 55(I) of the Kerala Abkari Act and Section 118(i) of the Kerala Police Act, is liable to be quashed, since he failed to substantiate quashment as sought for. Permission granted. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. As such the investigation shall go on. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE nkr

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial