Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Harikrishnan, vs State of Kerala,

Harikrishnan, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 01, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1400516

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./9496/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Harikrishnan,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

.....stage.6. the applicant was arrested on 15.10.2023 and sincethen he is in custody. recovery has already been effected. the investigation is practically over. the applicant has no criminal antecedents. for all these reasons, i do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. in the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -(i) the applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court.(ii) the applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.(iii) the applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. on every saturday until further orders. he shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required. bail appl. no. 9496 of 2023 4(iv) the applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.(v) the applicant shall not attempt to contact any of theprosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.(vi) the applicant shall not leave the state of kerala without the permission of the trial court.(vii) the application, if any, for deletion/modification ofthe bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge ajt

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 9496 OF 2023 CRIME NO.628/2023 OF Pulinkunnu Police Station, Alappuzha PETITIONER/1st ACCUSED: HARIKRISHNAN, AGED 24 YEARS S/O SURENDRAN, ARAKKATHARA HOUSE, KAVALAM VILLAGE, KAVALAM P.O,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688506 BY ADVS. M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY MATHEW DEVASSI ANANTHAKRISHNAN A. KARTHA

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT AND STATE: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 SMT. T.V.NEEMA-PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BAIL APPL. NO. 9496 OF 2023 2

ORDER

This application is filed u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.628/2023 of Pulinkunnu Police Station. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 22(b) of the NDPS Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, on

15.10.2023, at 03.15 A.M, the applicant was found in possession of 27.15 gms of methamphetamine, in contravention of the provisions of the NDPS Act and the Rules and thereby committed the offence.

4. I have heard Sri. M P. Madhavankutty, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt. T.V. Neema, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that

the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to get bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and

BAIL APPL. NO. 9496 OF 2023 3 he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was arrested on 15.10.2023 and since

then he is in custody. Recovery has already been effected. The investigation is practically over. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For all these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. on every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required. BAIL APPL. NO. 9496 OF 2023 4

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the

prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of

the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE ajt

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial