Thresyamma John vs Radhakrishnan. P.

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 30, 2023

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1400219

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1400219
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Gopinath P.
Decided On: Nov 30, 2023
Case Number: Con.Case(C)/2395/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Thresyamma John

Respondent

Radhakrishnan. P.

Excerpt

.....thamarassery p.o., kozhikode district, pin - 673573 sri g. sudheer (pp) this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 30.11.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: con.case(c) no. 2395 of 2023 2judgmentthis contempt of court case has been filedcomplaining that the directions contained in the judgmentdated 02.08.2023 in w.p.(c) no.20898 of 2023 has not been complied with.2. the learned government pleader submits that theorder has been complied with and hand over a copy of theorder passed.3. learned counsel appearing for the petitionersubmits that though the order states that notice was issued to the petitioner, no such notice was issued to the petitioner. learned government pleader submits that if the petitioner or her authorised representative appears before the officer, fresh orders can be passed after taking note of any document (that may be produced by the petitioner) and considering the directions issued by this court in the judgment dated 02.08.2023.4. taking note of the submission of the learnedcon.case(c) no. 2395 of 2023 3 government pleader, this contempt of court case is closed, directing that if the petitioner or her authorised representative appears before the officer on 14.12.2023, the matter shall be reconsidered and fresh orders shall be passed, taking note of the documents (that may be produced by the petitioner) and considering the directions contained in the judgment. the contempt of court case is closed. sd/- gopinath p. judge ajt con.case(c) no. 2395 of 2023 4 appendix of con.case(c) 2395/2023 petitioner annexures annexure a a certified copy of the judgment dated 02.08.2023 in w.p.(c) no. 20898/2023 of this hon'ble court annexure b a true copy of the postal delivery receipt dated 07.08.2023

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 CON.CASE(C) NO. 2395 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 20898/2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C): THRESYAMMA JOHN AGED 79 YEARS D/O ANTONY, EDAPATTUKAVUNGAL HOUSE, EROODE, KOODATHAI POST, THAMARASSERY (VIA), KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673580, NOW RESIDING AT A25(3), EDAPAZHANJI - PANGOD, THIRUMALA POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695006 BY ADVS. GODWIN JOSEPH ARUN BABU B. RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT No.3 IN WP(C): RADHAKRISHNAN. P. AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS TAHSILDAR, THAMARASSERY TALUK OFFICE, THAMARASSERY P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673573 SRI G. SUDHEER (PP) THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CON.CASE(C) NO. 2395 OF 2023 2

JUDGMENT

This Contempt of Court Case has been filed

complaining that the directions contained in the judgment

dated 02.08.2023 in W.P.(C) No.20898 of 2023 has not been complied with.

2. The learned Government Pleader submits that the

order has been complied with and hand over a copy of the

order passed.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

submits that though the order states that notice was issued to the petitioner, no such notice was issued to the petitioner. Learned Government pleader submits that if the petitioner or her authorised representative appears before the officer, fresh orders can be passed after taking note of any document (that may be produced by the petitioner) and considering the directions issued by this Court in the judgment dated 02.08.2023.

4. Taking note of the submission of the learned

CON.CASE(C) NO. 2395 OF 2023 3 Government Pleader, this Contempt of Court case is closed, directing that if the petitioner or her authorised representative appears before the officer on 14.12.2023, the matter shall be reconsidered and fresh orders shall be passed, taking note of the documents (that may be produced by the petitioner) and considering the directions contained in the judgment. The Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE ajt CON.CASE(C) NO. 2395 OF 2023 4 APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 2395/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 02.08.2023 IN W.P.(C) NO. 20898/2023 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT Annexure B A TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL DELIVERY RECEIPT DATED 07.08.2023

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2023 Same Parties Thresyamma John vs Radhakrishnan. P. Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Gopinath P.