Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Tomy Thomas vs the State of Kerala

Tomy Thomas vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 03, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1400153

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/33052/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Tomy Thomas

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh thursday, the 3rd day of august 2023 / 12th sravana, 1945 wp(c) no. 33052 of 2014 petitioner/s: tomy thomas, aged 53 years managing partner, hotel arcadia regency, alappuzha, now residing at kulappurathu house, ruby nagar p.o., changanassery, kottayam. by adv sri.m.k.chandra mohandas respondent/s: 1 the state of kerala represented by the secretary to government, local self government department, government secretariat, thiruvananthapuram-695001.2 the alappuzha municipality represented by its secretary, municipal council, alappuzha-688501. 3 the secretary, alappuzha municipality, municipal council, alappuzha-688501. by advs. sri.azad babu, sc, alappuzha municipality this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 03.08.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: -2-judgmentlearned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to the efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous. hence, the same may be dismissed as such.2. considering the aforesaid submission, this writpetition is dismissed as having become infructuous. sd/- dinesh kumar singh judge jjj -3- appendix of wp(c) 33052/2014 petitioner exhibits exhibit-p1:a copy of the tax receipt dated 13.08.2009. exhibit-p2:a copy of the tax receipt dated 11.07.2011. exhibit-p3: copy of the notification dated 15.03.2011. exhibit-p4:a copy of the notification dated 14.01.2013. exhibit-p5:a copy of the demand notice dated 31.01.2014. exhibit-p6:a copy of the representation dated 06.02.2014. exhibit-p7:a copy of the demand notice dated 18.09.2014. exhibit-p8:a copy of the demand notice. exhibit-p9:a copy of the objection. exhibit-p10:a copy of the notice no.t3-2209/14 dated 13.10.2014. exhibit-p11:a copy of the notice no.t3-2209/14 dated 07.11.2014.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 12TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 33052 OF 2014 PETITIONER/S: TOMY THOMAS, AGED 53 YEARS MANAGING PARTNER, HOTEL ARCADIA REGENCY, ALAPPUZHA, NOW RESIDING AT KULAPPURATHU HOUSE, RUBY NAGAR P.O., CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2 THE ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, ALAPPUZHA-688501. 3 THE SECRETARY, ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, ALAPPUZHA-688501. BY ADVS. SRI.AZAD BABU, SC, ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

JUDGMENT

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that due to the efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the same may be dismissed as such.

2. Considering the aforesaid submission, this writ

petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE jjj -3- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 33052/2014 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT-P1:A COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 13.08.2009. EXHIBIT-P2:A COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 11.07.2011. EXHIBIT-P3: COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 15.03.2011. EXHIBIT-P4:A COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 14.01.2013. EXHIBIT-P5:A COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 31.01.2014. EXHIBIT-P6:A COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 06.02.2014. EXHIBIT-P7:A COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 18.09.2014. EXHIBIT-P8:A COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE. EXHIBIT-P9:A COPY OF THE OBJECTION. EXHIBIT-P10:A COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.T3-2209/14 DATED 13.10.2014. EXHIBIT-P11:A COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.T3-2209/14 DATED 07.11.2014.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial