Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sathyadevan vs Excise Inspector

Sathyadevan vs Excise Inspector

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 01, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1399723

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./9375/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sathyadevan

Respondent

Excise Inspector

Excerpt

.....petitioner would saythat the petitioner is totally innocent and falsely implicated with ulterior motives. at any rate, he points out that the petitioner is in custody from 11.10.2023, and continued custody of the petitioner is unnecessary.5. the learned public prosecutor opposed the petition and points out that the petitioner is not entitled to bail.6. after having considered the submissions of the learnedcounsel for the petitioner and learned public prosecutor and considering the quantity involved, the fact that he has been in custody from 11.10.2023 and also the fact that there are no antecedents reported against the petitioner, since there is no apprehension raised by the prosecution that if released on bail the petitioner is likely to abscond, i hold that bail can be granted to the petitioner.accordingly, this application is allowed, and the petitioner is granted bail subject to the following conditions:-(i) the petitioner shall be released on bail on executing bond for rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court;(ii) the petitioner shall report before the investigating officer as and when directed;(iii) the petitioner shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence the witnesses; (iv)the petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.(v) if any of the conditions are violated, the court concerned will be empowered to take steps for cancellation of bail as per law. sd/- mohammed nias c.p judgemtk appendix of bail appl. 9375/2023 petitioner annexures a true copy of the order in cmp no.1981 /23 in crime no.115/2023 dt annexure a1 magistrate court i kottarakkara

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 10TH KARTHIKA, BAIL APPL. NO. 9375 OF 2023 CRIME NO.115/2023 OF EZHUKONE EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, KOLLAM AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CMP 1981/2023 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I,KOTTARAKKARA

PETITIONER/ACCUSED: SATHYADEVAN AGED 48 YEARS, S/O BHANU, THADATHILVEEDU,VAIDYARUMUKKU, PAVITHRESWARAM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK ,KOLLAM ., PIN - 690507 BY ADVS. K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) K.B.UDAYAKUMAR RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: EXCISE INSPECTOR 1 EZHUCONE EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, EZHUKONE,KOLLAM., PIN - 691505 STATE OF KERALA 2 REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 BY SMT. T.V. NEEMA, SR.PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 1st day of November, 2023 This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.115 of 2023 of Ezhukone Excise Range Office, Kollam, for having committed offences punishable under Sections 8(1) and 8(2) of the Abkari Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that, on 11.10.2023

at about 4.10 p.m, the accused was found in illegal possession of 2.500 litres of arrack in front of the house of the accused by name Thadathil Veedu, Vaidyaru Mukku, Pavithreswaram Village. Thus, the petitioner committed offences alleged.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would say

that the petitioner is totally innocent and falsely implicated with ulterior motives. At any rate, he points out that the petitioner is in custody from 11.10.2023, and continued custody of the petitioner is unnecessary.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the petition and points out that the petitioner is not entitled to bail.

6. After having considered the submissions of the learned

counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and considering the quantity involved, the fact that he has been in custody from 11.10.2023 and also the fact that there are no antecedents reported against the petitioner, since there is no apprehension raised by the prosecution that if released on bail the petitioner is likely to abscond, I hold that bail can be granted to the petitioner.

Accordingly, this application is allowed, and the petitioner is granted bail subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court;

(ii) The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when directed;

(iii) The petitioner shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence the witnesses; (iv)The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.

(v) If any of the conditions are violated, the court concerned will be empowered to take steps for cancellation of bail as per law. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P JUDGE

mtk APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 9375/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CMP NO.1981 /23 IN CRIME NO.115/2023 DT Annexure A1 MAGISTRATE COURT I KOTTARAKKARA

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial