Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ruby vs Naruvamoodu Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd T.No.160

RUBY vs Naruvamoodu Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd T.No.160

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 12, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1388650

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RP/941/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

RUBY

Respondent

Naruvamoodu Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd T.No.160

Excerpt

.....petition having come up for admission on 12.10.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: rp no. 941 of 2023 2orderthis review petition has been filed, seeking review of thejudgment dated 04.08.2023 in w.p.(c.) no.7623 of 2023,which was disposed of, permitting the review petitioner/writ petitioner to pay off the liability due under a loan availed from the 1st respondent bank, in some instalments.2. learned counsel appearing for the reviewpetitioner would submit that the submission made by the learned counsel, then appearing for the writ petitioner/review petitioner that the petitioner may be permitted to pay off the liability in some instalments, was not based on the instructions given by the petitioner/review petitioner and therefore, the review petition may be allowed.3. heard the learned counsel appearing for the 1 st respondent also.4. having regard to the fact that it is the specificcase of the review petitioner that no instructions have been given to the earlier counsel to submit that the liability can be paid of in instalments, the review petition is allowed. thejudgment dated 04.08.2023 in w.p.(c.) no.7623 of 2023 isrecalled. registry shall list the writ petition for consideration rp no. 941 of 2023 3 before the court, in accordance with the roster. sd/- gopinath p. judge ajt

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 20TH ASWINA, 1945 RP NO. 941 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT WP(C) 7623/2023 DATED 04.08.2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: RUBY AGED 56 YEARS W/O PAUL RATNAM, RESIDING AT KURUVILLA PUTHENVEEDU, PERUMBU ROAD, AYYANIMOODU, VEDIVECHANKOVIL, PALLICHAL VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN- 695501., PIN - 695501 BY ADVS. SHAIJAN C.GEORGE VINAI JOHN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 NARUVAMOODU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD T.NO.160 NARUVAMOODU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695528 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN-695528., PIN - 695528 2 SALE OFFICER NARUVAMOODU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.T.NO. 160, NARUVAMOODU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695528., PIN - SRI P N MOHANAN (FOR RESP) THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RP NO. 941 OF 2023 2

ORDER

This review petition has been filed, seeking review of the

judgment dated 04.08.2023 in W.P.(C.) No.7623 of 2023,

which was disposed of, permitting the review petitioner/writ petitioner to pay off the liability due under a loan availed from the 1st respondent bank, in some instalments.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the review

petitioner would submit that the submission made by the learned counsel, then appearing for the writ petitioner/review petitioner that the petitioner may be permitted to pay off the liability in some instalments, was not based on the instructions given by the petitioner/review petitioner and therefore, the review petition may be allowed.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the 1 st respondent also.

4. Having regard to the fact that it is the specific

case of the review petitioner that no instructions have been given to the earlier counsel to submit that the liability can be paid of in instalments, the review petition is allowed. The

judgment dated 04.08.2023 in W.P.(C.) No.7623 of 2023 is

recalled. Registry shall list the writ petition for consideration RP NO. 941 OF 2023 3 before the Court, in accordance with the roster. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE ajt

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial