Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ranjith Kumar @ Rajith Kumar vs State of Kerala

Ranjith Kumar @ Rajith Kumar vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Sep 30, 2023
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1388002

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/7231/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ranjith Kumar @ Rajith Kumar

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....magistrate of first class ,taliparamba petitioner/accused: ranjith kumar @ rajith kumar aged 40 years s/o.thambi, pannimattathil house, kolarthotti, kooveri, taliparamba, kannur district., pin - 670 581. by adv m.anuroop respondents/state and de-facto complainant:1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, pin - 682 031. 2 balakrishnan aged 64 years s/o. kunhambu, pazhedathu house, koovodudesom, taliparamba, kannur district., pin - 670 141. 3 balakrishnan aged 71 years s/o. raghavan, kunnol house, thaliyil, anthoor amsom, taliparamba, kannur district, pin - 670 563. 4 bhargavi aged 61 years w/o. balakrishnan, kunnol house, thaliyil, anthoor amsom, taliparamba, kannur district., pin - 670 563. :2:by advs murshid ali m.(for r2, r3 and r4) vipin narayan-public prosecutor this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 30.09.2023, the court on the same day passed the following: :3:orderdated this the 30th day of september, 2023 the petitioner is the accused in crime no.204/2019 of taliparamba police station, kannur distirct, which is now pending as c.c.no.1838/2023 on the file of the judicial first class magistrate court, taliparamba, alleging commission of offences under section 498a of the indian penal code. the allegation against the petitioner is that after the marriage of the petitioner with the daughter of respondents 3 and 4. the petitioner had subjected the daughter of respondents 3 and 4 to mental and physical cruelty and leading to her suicide on 22.02.2019.2. the learned counsel appearing for the petitionerwould submit that the petitioner and the deceased (daughter of respondents 3 and 4) got married on 29.10.2000. it is submitted that she had not committed suicide owing to any harassment by the petitioner. it is submitted that the daughter of respondents 3 and 4/wife of the petitioner died by suicide on 22.02.2019 nearly 19 years after the date of:4:marriage. it is submitted that she had not filed any complaints.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. SATURDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 8TH ASWINA, CRL.MC NO. 7231 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CC 1838/2023 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,TALIPARAMBA PETITIONER/ACCUSED: RANJITH KUMAR @ RAJITH KUMAR AGED 40 YEARS S/O.THAMBI, PANNIMATTATHIL HOUSE, KOLARTHOTTI, KOOVERI, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT., PIN - 670 581. BY ADV M.ANUROOP RESPONDENTS/STATE AND DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT:

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682 031. 2 BALAKRISHNAN AGED 64 YEARS S/O. KUNHAMBU, PAZHEDATHU HOUSE, KOOVODUDESOM, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT., PIN - 670 141. 3 BALAKRISHNAN AGED 71 YEARS S/O. RAGHAVAN, KUNNOL HOUSE, THALIYIL, ANTHOOR AMSOM, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670 563. 4 BHARGAVI AGED 61 YEARS W/O. BALAKRISHNAN, KUNNOL HOUSE, THALIYIL, ANTHOOR AMSOM, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT., PIN - 670 563. :2:

BY ADVS MURSHID ALI M.(FOR R2, R3 AND R4) VIPIN NARAYAN-PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: :3:

ORDER

Dated this the 30th day of September, 2023 The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.204/2019 of Taliparamba Police Station, Kannur Distirct, which is now pending as C.C.No.1838/2023 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Taliparamba, alleging commission of offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is that after the marriage of the petitioner with the daughter of respondents 3 and 4. The petitioner had subjected the daughter of respondents 3 and 4 to mental and physical cruelty and leading to her suicide on 22.02.2019.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

would submit that the petitioner and the deceased (daughter of respondents 3 and 4) got married on 29.10.2000. It is submitted that she had not committed suicide owing to any harassment by the petitioner. It is submitted that the daughter of respondents 3 and 4/wife of the petitioner died by suicide on 22.02.2019 nearly 19 years after the date of

:4:

marriage. It is submitted that she had not filed any complaints against the petitioner when she was alive and this itself is sufficient proof of the fact that the petitioner has not committed any offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. It is also submitted that respondents 3 and 4 (parents of the deceased) do not wish to continue with the prosecution against the petitioner. It is submitted that 2 nd respondent is the uncle of the deceased, who gave the First Information Statement in Crime No.204/2019. It is submitted that the matter is now pending as C.C. No.1838/2023 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Taliparamba. The learned counsel also made reference to Annexures A3, A4 and A5 affidavits executed by respondents 2, 3 and 4 to establish respondents 2, 3 and 4 have no intention to continue with the prosecution against the petitioner.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel appearing for respondents 2, 3 and 4 would confirm that respondents 2, 3 and 4 do not wish to continue with the prosecution against the petitioner.

4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and the learned :5:

counsel appearing for respondents 2, 3 and 4, I am of the view that this Crl.M.C. can be allowed on the ground of settlement. There is no public interest involved in continuing the proceedings against the petitioner. Therefore, in exercise of the jurisdiction vested in this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, further proceedings against the petitioner can be quashed on the ground of settlement.

Accordingly, the Crl.M.C is allowed and all further proceedings in C.C No.1838/2023 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Taliparamba (Crime No.204/2019 of Taliparamba police station) will stand quashed as against the petitioner. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE AMR :6: APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 7231/2023 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES Annexure-A1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR DATED 22-02-2019 IN CRIME NO. 204/2019 IN TALIPARAMBA POLICE STATION. Annexure-A2 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 30-11-2019 IN CRIME NO. 204/2019 OF TALIPARAMBA POLICE STATION. Annexure-A3 THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 20-08-2023 SWORN IN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. Annexure-A4 THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 20-08-2023 SWORN IN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. Annexure-A5 THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 20-08-2023 SWORN IN BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial