Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Muhammed Rasheed, vs State of Kerala,

Muhammed Rasheed, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 31, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1386979

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./7625/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Muhammed Rasheed,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

.....in crime no.1132/2023of kallambalam police station, thiruvananthapuram rural, registered for offences punishable under sections 451, 341, 323, 324, 427, 326 r/w. section 34 of the indian penal code.3. the prosecution allegation is that the de-factocomplainant owed an amount of rs.15000/- to the applicant herein. out of that animosity, on 16.07.2023 at 11 p.m., the accused persons, in furtherance of their common intention, trespassed into the residential house of the informant situated at maruthikunnu desom, and they attacked him. 4th accused wrongfully restrained the informant and demanded the key of his vehicle. at that time, the other accused forcefully caught hold of the informant, and 2nd accused forcefully took the key of the vehicle belonged to the de facto complainant and the 2nd accused fisted the face of the informant with the key, and as a result of that the informant sustained injury on his nasal bone and on his left eyebrow. thus, the accused have committed theaforesaid offences.4. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned public prosecutor were heard.5. after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner andthe learned public prosecutor and taking into account the accusations levelled against the petitioner and also the nature of injuries caused as evident from the wound certificate, i am of the view that the petitioner is not entitled to get anticipatory bail as it might affect a proper investigation. therefore, the following directions are issued:-in the event the petitioner surrenders before the investigating officer in two weeks, he shall be interrogated and thereafter, shall be produced before the magistrate having jurisdiction on the date of surrender itself. if the petitioner moves for bail, the court below shall, untrammelled by any of the observations in this order, consider the bail application on merits as expeditiously as possible. if the petitioner does not surrender before the investigating officer, as.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 9TH KARTHIKA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 7625 OF 2023 CRIME NO.1132/2023 OF KALLAMBALAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1: MUHAMMED RASHEED, S/O. ABDUL KAREEM AGED 65 YEARS ALI MANZIL, MARUTHIKUNNU P.O., NAVAYIKKULAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695603 BY ADVS. DONA AUGUSTINE ARUN RAJ RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA, 1 REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALLAMBALAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695611 OTHER PRESENT: SMT. T.V. NEEMA. SR. PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.1132/2023

of Kallambalam Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram Rural, registered for offences punishable under Sections 451, 341, 323, 324, 427, 326 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution allegation is that the de-facto

complainant owed an amount of Rs.15000/- to the applicant herein. Out of that animosity, on 16.07.2023 at 11 p.m., the accused persons, in furtherance of their common intention, trespassed into the residential house of the informant situated at Maruthikunnu desom, and they attacked him. 4th accused wrongfully restrained the informant and demanded the key of his vehicle. At that time, the other accused forcefully caught hold of the informant, and 2nd accused forcefully took the key of the vehicle belonged to the de facto complainant and the 2nd accused fisted the face of the informant with the key, and as a result of that the informant sustained injury on his nasal bone and on his left eyebrow. Thus, the accused have committed the

aforesaid offences.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor were heard.

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned Public Prosecutor and taking into account the accusations levelled against the petitioner and also the nature of injuries caused as evident from the wound certificate, I am of the view that the petitioner is not entitled to get anticipatory bail as it might affect a proper investigation. Therefore, the following directions are issued:-

In the event the petitioner surrenders before the Investigating Officer in two weeks, he shall be interrogated and thereafter, shall be produced before the Magistrate having jurisdiction on the date of surrender itself. If the petitioner moves for bail, the court below shall, untrammelled by any of the observations in this order, consider the bail application on merits as expeditiously as possible. If the petitioner does not surrender before the Investigating Officer, as directed above, the Investigating Officer will be free to arrest the

petitioner as if no order has been passed in this case. The Bail Application is disposed of as above. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. JUDGE shg

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial