Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.K.Abdul Rasheed vs the Tahsildar

K.K.Abdul Rasheed vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 29, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1385566

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/16215/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.K.Abdul Rasheed

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

wp(c) no. 16215 of 2014 1in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice viju abraham monday, the 29th day of may 2023 / 8th jyaishta, 1945 petitioner: k.k.abdul rasheed s/o p.p kunhahammed kalathiparambil house, post gramam, via veliamkode, ponnani taluk, malappuram taluk by adv sri.c.m.mohammed iquabal respondents: 1 the tahsildar ponnani taluk office, post ponnani, malappuram 2 the village officer veliyamcode village office, post veliyamcode, ponnani taluk, malappuram district 679579 3 athirappilly prameela w/o chandran, veliyamcode, post gramam, malappuram by g.p., sri. bimal k. nath this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 29.05.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c) no. 16215 of 2014 2viju abraham , j.=========================== ============================ dated this the 29th day of may, 2023judgmentwhen the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- viju abraham judge sbk/- wp(c) no. 16215 of 2014 3 appendix of wp(c) 16215/2014 petitioner exhibitsexhibit p1: true copy of the complaint filed by the 3rd respondent before the 2nd respondent dated nil exhibit p2: a true copy of the report of the 3rd respondent dated 01-08-2013 exhibit p3: true copy of the report of the 3rd respondent dated 03-02-2014 exhibit p4: true copy of the communication issued to the petitioner by the public information officer, taluk office ponnani dated 07-06-2014 exhibit p5: a true copy of the order of the ist respondent dated nil

Full Judgment

WP(C) No. 16215 of 2014 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 8TH JYAISHTA, 1945 PETITIONER: K.K.ABDUL RASHEED S/O P.P KUNHAHAMMED KALATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, POST GRAMAM, VIA VELIAMKODE, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM TALUK BY ADV SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENTS: 1 THE TAHSILDAR PONNANI TALUK OFFICE, POST PONNANI, MALAPPURAM 2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER VELIYAMCODE VILLAGE OFFICE, POST VELIYAMCODE, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 679579 3 ATHIRAPPILLY PRAMEELA W/O CHANDRAN, VELIYAMCODE, POST GRAMAM, MALAPPURAM BY G.P., SRI. BIMAL K. NATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) No. 16215 of 2014 2

VIJU ABRAHAM , J.

=========================== ============================ Dated this the 29th day of May, 2023

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sbk/- WP(C) No. 16215 of 2014 3 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16215/2014 PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED NIL EXHIBIT P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 01-08-2013 EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 03-02-2014 EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, TALUK OFFICE PONNANI DATED 07-06-2014 EXHIBIT P5: A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE IST RESPONDENT DATED NIL

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial