S.S.Traders vs the Sub Inspector of Police

S.S.Traders vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 11, 2023

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1384775

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1384775
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mrs. Justice Shoba Annamma Eapen
Decided On: Jan 11, 2023
Case Number: WP(C)/15117/2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.S.Traders

Respondent

The Sub Inspector of Police

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice shoba annamma eapen wednesday, the 11th day of january 2023 / 21st pousha, petitioner/s: s.s.traders, aged 74 years 5, 190, bazar road, cochin-682002, represented by its proprietor mahavir prasad jain, s/o.champalal jain. by adv sri.k.g.anil babu respondent/s: 1 the sub inspector of police kalady police station, kalady p.o., ernakulam district-683574. 2 the revenue divisional officer fort cochin-682001. by adv government pleader other present: gp smt resmitha r chandran this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 11.01.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..2..judgmentthis writ petition is filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to release vehicle nos. kl/42-b 2068 and kl/7-bb 3126, container no.bhcu 4956889 and the goods seized by the respondents.2. when this matter came up for admission on 22.05.2015, this court, by interim order, directed the 1 st respondent to release the vehicles, container and thegoods to the petitioner subject to any further proceedings. the petitioner was also permitted to take the goods back to the consignor and was directed to produce necessary documents evidencing the exit of the goods from the state.3. today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner.4. the learned government pleader submits that on the basis of the interim order, the vehicles, container and the goods were released to the petitioner. ..3..5. since the petitioner has received the vehicles, container and goods on the basis of the interim order, the petitioner might have lost interest in prosecuting the matter. hence, the writ petition is closed. sd/- shoba annamma eapen judge bka/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 21ST POUSHA, PETITIONER/S: S.S.TRADERS, AGED 74 YEARS 5, 190, BAZAR ROAD, COCHIN-682002, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MAHAVIR PRASAD JAIN, S/O.CHAMPALAL JAIN. BY ADV SRI.K.G.ANIL BABU RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALADY POLICE STATION, KALADY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683574. 2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER FORT COCHIN-682001. BY ADV GOVERNMENT PLEADER OTHER PRESENT: GP SMT RESMITHA R CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to release vehicle Nos. KL/42-B 2068 and KL/7-BB 3126, container No.BHCU 4956889 and the goods seized by the respondents.

2. When this matter came up for admission on 22.05.2015, this Court, by interim order, directed the 1 st respondent to release the vehicles, container and the

goods to the petitioner subject to any further proceedings. The petitioner was also permitted to take the goods back to the consignor and was directed to produce necessary documents evidencing the exit of the goods from the State.

3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Pleader submits that on the basis of the interim order, the vehicles, container and the goods were released to the petitioner. ..3..

5. Since the petitioner has received the vehicles, container and goods on the basis of the interim order, the petitioner might have lost interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGE bka/-

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2023 Same Parties S.S.Traders vs The Sub Inspector of Police Same Judge Honourable Mrs. Justice Shoba Annamma Eapen