Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anu vs State of Kerala

ANU vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Sep 01, 2023
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1384196

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./7289/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ANU

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....intention to outrage the modesty of the victim. the applicant has no criminal antecedents. considering the allegations levelled against the applicant, his custodial interrogation does notappear to be necessary. for these reasons, it is a fit case where pre-arrest bail can be granted to the applicant. in the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:- ..4..(i) the applicant shall be released on bail in the eventof his arrest on executing a bond for rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.(ii) the applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.(iii) the applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every saturday until further orders. he shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.(iv) the applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.(v) the applicant shall not attempt to contact any ofthe prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation. ..5..(vi) the applicant shall not leave the state of kerala without the permission of the trial court.(vii) the application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge apa

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 10TH BHADRA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 7289 OF 2023 CRIME NO.1006 OF 2023 OF VELLARADA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PETITIONER/1st ACCUSED: ANU AGED 21 YEARS, S/O MANIYAN AJITH BHAVAN, PANACHAMOODU P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695505 BY ADV S.NIKHIL SANKAR RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 SRI.NOUSHAD K.A [PP] THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

ORDER

Dated this the 1st day of September, 2023 This application is filed u/s 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.1006/2023 of Vellarada Police Station. The offences alleged are punishable under Section 354 of the I.P.C. and Sections 8 r/w 7 & 16 of the Po CSO Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on accused No.2 came in a bike, caught hold of the hand of the victim with an intention to outrage her modesty and thereby committed the offence.

4. I have heard Sri.Nikhil Sankar S., the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.Noushad K.A., the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the ..3..

present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to get bail. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. The applicant is aged 21 years. The victim is aged

15 years. The only allegation is that the applicant came in a bike and caught hold of the hand of the victim. There is nothing to suggest in the F.I.S. that, the said act was done by the applicant with sexual intent or with the intention to outrage the modesty of the victim. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. Considering the allegations levelled against the applicant, his custodial interrogation does not

appear to be necessary. For these reasons, it is a fit case where pre-arrest bail can be granted to the applicant. In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:- ..4..

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event

of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of

the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation. ..5..

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE APA

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial