Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nithin V vs State of Kerala

Nithin V vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Sep 01, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1383043

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./7114/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nithin V

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....were remanded to judicial custodyon 23.07.2023. the recovery had already been effected and the investigation is over. for all these reasons, i do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicants is required for any purpose. hence, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail. in the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -(i) the applicants shall be released on bail onexecuting a bond for rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional magistrate/court.(ii) the applicants shall fully co-operate with the investigation.(iii) the applicants shall appear before theinvestigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m every saturday until further orders. they shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.(iv) the applicants shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.(v) the applicants shall not attempt to contact any ofthe prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.(vi) the applicants shall not leave the state of kerala without the permission of the trial court.(vii) the application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge rpr appendix of bail appl. 7114/2023 petitioner annexures annexure 1 true copy of the crime no.89/2023 dated 23.07.2023 on the file of the excise range palakkad

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 10TH BHADRA, 1945 PETITIONERS: 1 NITHIN V AGED 20 YEARS S/O RADHIKA, VALAPPIL HOUSE, KAMBALAKKAL POST, KEERIPOTTY, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 679 333. 2 NITHIN RAJ K R AGED 21 YEARS S/O RAJESH, KANNATH HOUSE, KUNNUMMAL POTTY POST, NAROKKAVU, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 679 331. BY ADV M.DEVESH RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 OTHER PRESENT: SRI. SANGEETHA RAJ N.R [PP] THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

This application is filed u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2. The applicants are the accused Nos. 1 and 2 in

Crime No.89 /2023 of Palakkad Excise Range. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) and 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act (In short, NDPS Act’).

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 23.07.2023 at about 9.30 am, accused No.1 along with the accused No.2 were found in possession of 2.015 Kilograms of Ganja in contravention of the NDPS Act.

4. I have heard Sri. M. Devesh, the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri. Sangeetha Raj N.R, the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted

that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled to get bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicants, and they are not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicants were remanded to judicial custody

on 23.07.2023. The recovery had already been effected and the investigation is over. For all these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicants is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail. In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicants shall be released on bail on

executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicants shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicants shall appear before the

investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m every Saturday until further orders. They shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicants shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicants shall not attempt to contact any of

the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicants shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE rpr APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 7114/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF THE CRIME NO.89/2023 DATED 23.07.2023 ON THE FILE OF THE EXCISE RANGE PALAKKAD

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial