Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

T.M.George vs Nit

T.M.George vs NIT

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 03, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1381683

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/15707/2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

T.M.George

Respondent

NIT

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran monday, the 3rd day of july 2023 / 12th ashadha, 1945 wp(c) no. 15707 of 2012 petitioners: 1 t.m.george 2 p.v.raghu 3 sanal p.r. 4 a.ajayan 5 mohanlal d. 6 m.reghunathan achary 7 krishnankutty v. 8 sreenivasan p. sri.sinu.g.nath respondents:1 national institute of technology (nit) represented by its director, national institute of technology (nit) nit campus p.o., calicut- 2 board of directors of nit calciut represented by its chairperson, nit calicut, 3 union of india (uoi) represented by the secretary to government of india, dept. of higher education,ministry of human resources development (mhrd), government of india, shastri bhawan, new delhi-110 001. 4 suresh k.c 5 vasu t.c. 6 surendran p.k. 7 sathiya p.k. 8 abhilash a. sri.shyam padman sri.p.parameswaran nair,asg of india sri.c.m.andrewsthis writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 03.07.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmenteven though this matter was called more than twice today, there was no representation for the petitioners. i, therefore, suspect that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this matter any further. accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for default. sd/- devan ramachandran, judge lsn

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JULY 2023 / 12TH ASHADHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 15707 OF 2012 PETITIONERS: 1 T.M.GEORGE 2 P.V.RAGHU 3 SANAL P.R. 4 A.AJAYAN 5 MOHANLAL D. 6 M.REGHUNATHAN ACHARY 7 KRISHNANKUTTY V. 8 SREENIVASAN P. SRI.SINU.G.NATH RESPONDENTS:

1 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (NIT) REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (NIT) NIT CAMPUS P.O., CALICUT- 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NIT CALCIUT REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, NIT CALICUT, 3 UNION OF INDIA (UOI) REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPT. OF HIGHER EDUCATION,MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT (MHRD), GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-110 001. 4 SURESH K.C 5 VASU T.C. 6 SURENDRAN P.K. 7 SATHIYA P.K. 8 ABHILASH A. SRI.SHYAM PADMAN SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA SRI.C.M.ANDREWS

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Even though this matter was called more than twice today, there was no representation for the petitioners. I, therefore, suspect that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this matter any further. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, JUDGE lsn

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial