Subin Raj vs the Assistant Executive Engineer,

Subin Raj vs The Assistant Executive Engineer,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 01, 2023

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1380990

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1380990
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mrs. Justice Shoba Annamma Eapen
Decided On: Jun 01, 2023
Case Number: WP(C)/11508/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Subin Raj

Respondent

The Assistant Executive Engineer,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice shoba annamma eapen thursday, the 1st day of june 2023 / 11th jyaishta, 1945 wp(c) no. 11508 of 2014 petitioner: subin raj aged 27 years, s/o. radhakrishnan, subin nivas, konthuruthy p.o., elamkulam village, kanayannur taluk, pin - 682 013. by adv sri.suraj.s respondents: 1 kerala state housing board, ernakulam division, park avenue road, revenue tower, kochi - 682 031, represented by its assistant executive engineer. 2 kerala state housing board thiruvananthapuram,695 001 represented by its chairman. by advs. sri.george boban, sc, k.s.h.b. this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 01.06.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: -:2:-j u d g m e n tdated this 1st day of june, 2023 the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that, the petitioner was evicted from the room on 28.02.2020 and the writ petition was filed seeking for a direction to provide the basic amenities on the basement floor of the revenue tower, ernakulam. on the basis of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents, nothings survives in the writ petition. hence, the writ petition is closed. the petitioner if so advised, may file a representation before the respondent highlighting the grievance and the respondents shall consider the same as expeditiously as possible. sd/- shoba annamma eapen judge tr -:3:- appendix of wp(c) 11508/2014 petitioner exhibits exhibit-p1- true copy of the lease agreement dated exhibit-p2- true copy of the relevant portion of the brochure. exhibit-p3- true copy of the photograph of the toilet of reveneu tower. exhibit-p4- true copy of the photograph of the corridor of the basement floor of the revenue tower. exhibit-p5- true copy of the photograph of the ceiling. exhibit-p6- true copy of the complaint dated exhibit-p7- true copy of the letter dated 06/02/2014 issued by the ist respondent exhibit-p8- true copy of the letter dated 07/02/20

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 11TH JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 11508 OF 2014 PETITIONER: SUBIN RAJ AGED 27 YEARS, S/O. RADHAKRISHNAN, SUBIN NIVAS, KONTHURUTHY P.O., ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, PIN - 682 013. BY ADV SRI.SURAJ.S RESPONDENTS: 1 KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, ERNAKULAM DIVISION, PARK AVENUE ROAD, REVENUE TOWER, KOCHI - 682 031, REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER. 2 KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,695 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. BY ADVS. SRI.GEORGE BOBAN, SC, K.S.H.B. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:2:-

J U D G M E N T

Dated this 1st day of June, 2023 The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that, the petitioner was evicted from the room on 28.02.2020 and the writ petition was filed seeking for a direction to provide the basic amenities on the basement floor of the Revenue Tower, Ernakulam. On the basis of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents, nothings survives in the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is closed. The petitioner if so advised, may file a representation before the respondent highlighting the grievance and the respondents shall consider the same as expeditiously as possible. Sd/- SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGE TR -:3:- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11508/2014 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT-P1- TRUE COPY OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT DATED EXHIBIT-P2- TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE BROCHURE. EXHIBIT-P3- TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE TOILET OF REVENEU TOWER. EXHIBIT-P4- TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE CORRIDOR OF THE BASEMENT FLOOR OF THE REVENUE TOWER. EXHIBIT-P5- TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE CEILING. EXHIBIT-P6- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED EXHIBIT-P7- TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 06/02/2014 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT-P8- TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 07/02/2014 ISSUED BY THE ACCOUNT OFFICER OF THE RESPONDENTS EXHIBIT-P9- TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 31/03/2014

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2023 Same Parties Subin Raj vs The Assistant Executive Engineer, Same Judge Honourable Mrs. Justice Shoba Annamma Eapen