Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

T. Mohan Kumar vs T. Vijayakumar

T. Mohan Kumar vs T. Vijayakumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 03, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1380639

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/11135/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

T. Mohan Kumar

Respondent

T. Vijayakumar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice shoba annamma eapen monday, the 3rd day of july 2023 / 12th ashadha, 1945 wp(c) no. 11135 of 2014 petitioner: t. mohan kumar proprietor, sri. balaji lodge, east fort, thiruvananthapuram. sri.r.krishna raj smt.e.s.soni respondents: 1 t. vijayakumar proprietor, venkiteswara handloom soiety, east fort, thiruvananthapuram-695 023. 2 the city corporation of thiruvananthapuram represented by its secretary, corporation buildings, thiruvananthapuram-695 023. sri.d.n.krishnan nair sri.n.nandakumara menon (sr.) sri.n.nandakumara menon sr. sri.m.r.sudheendran suman chakravarthy adv.sri.p.k.manoj kumar-standing counsel this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 03.07.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: w.p. (c) no.11135 of 2014judgmentno representation for the learned counsel for the petitioner. the learned standing counsel for the 2nd respondent submits that the unauthorised construction has been demolished. hence, nothing survives in the writ petition. accordingly, the writ petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition if so desires. sd/- shoba annamma eapen judge smf

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JULY 2023 / 12TH ASHADHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 11135 OF 2014 PETITIONER: T. MOHAN KUMAR PROPRIETOR, SRI. BALAJI LODGE, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ SMT.E.S.SONI RESPONDENTS: 1 T. VIJAYAKUMAR PROPRIETOR, VENKITESWARA HANDLOOM SOIETY, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023. 2 THE CITY CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION BUILDINGS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023. SRI.D.N.KRISHNAN NAIR SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON (SR.) SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON SR. SRI.M.R.SUDHEENDRAN SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY ADV.SRI.P.K.MANOJ KUMAR-STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P. (C) No.11135 of 2014

JUDGMENT

No representation for the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent submits that the unauthorised construction has been demolished. Hence, nothing survives in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition if so desires. Sd/- SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGE SMF

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial