Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rema vs Salini

REMA vs Salini

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Dec 20, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1379650

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP (FC)/490/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

REMA

Respondent

Salini

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice amit rawal & the honourable mrs. justice c.s. sudha wednesday, the 20th day of december 2023 / 29th agrahayana, op (fc) no. 490 of 2021 against the order dated 02.09.2021 in e.a.no.72/2016 in e.p.no.27/2015 in o.p.no.222/2011 of family court, ottappalam petitioner/claim petitioner: rema, aged 52 years, w/o late krishnadas, krishna chaithanya, nellayaamsom, nellaya desom, ottapalam taluk, by adv v.a.vinod respondents/petitioners/respondents:1 salini, aged 53 years, d/o unnirarichanearadi, parangattilkalam veedu, alipparamba p.o, malapuram-679 357. 2 c.p.prasad, aged 58 years, s/o late venugopalan nedungadi, v.p.house, krishnapadi, nellaya desom, ottapalam taluk, this op (family court) having come up for admission on 20.12.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: amit rawal & c.s.sudha, jj. ------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- dated this the 20th day of december, 2023judgmentamit rawal, j.learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the liberty of this court for withdrawal of the petition. permission granted. accordingly, the op(fc) is dismissed as withdrawn. amit rawal c.s.sudha ak appendix of op (fc) 490/2021 petitioner's exhibits:- exhibit p1 true copy of the judgment in o.p.no.222/2011 dated 27.02.2013 of the family court, ottapalam. exhibit p2 true copy of the petition filed by the petitioner herein which was taken on file as e.a.72/2016 in e.p.no.27/2015 in o.p.no.222/2011. exhibit p3 true copy of the agreement for sale dated 16.06.2006. exhibit p4 true copy of the sale deed no.1483/2011 dated 15.03.2011 exhibit p5 true copy of the objection filed by the 1st respondent in ea 72/2016 in e.p.27/2015 in o.p.no.222/2011 of the family court, ottappalam. exhibit p6 true copy of the order dated 02.09.2021 in e.a.72/2016 in e.p.no.27/2015 in o.p.no.222/2011 of the family court, ottapalam.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA, OP (FC) NO. 490 OF 2021 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 02.09.2021 IN E.A.NO.72/2016 IN E.P.NO.27/2015 IN O.P.NO.222/2011 OF FAMILY COURT, OTTAPPALAM PETITIONER/CLAIM PETITIONER: REMA, AGED 52 YEARS, W/O LATE KRISHNADAS, KRISHNA CHAITHANYA, NELLAYAAMSOM, NELLAYA DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, BY ADV V.A.VINOD RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS:

1 SALINI, AGED 53 YEARS, D/O UNNIRARICHANEARADI, PARANGATTILKALAM VEEDU, ALIPPARAMBA P.O, MALAPURAM-679 357. 2 C.P.PRASAD, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O LATE VENUGOPALAN NEDUNGADI, V.P.HOUSE, KRISHNAPADI, NELLAYA DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AMIT RAWAL & C.S.SUDHA, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of December, 2023

JUDGMENT

Amit Rawal, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the liberty of this Court for withdrawal of the petition. Permission granted. Accordingly, the OP(FC) is dismissed as withdrawn. AMIT RAWAL C.S.SUDHA ak APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 490/2021 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.222/2011 DATED 27.02.2013 OF THE FAMILY COURT, OTTAPALAM. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN WHICH WAS TAKEN ON FILE AS E.A.72/2016 IN E.P.NO.27/2015 IN O.P.NO.222/2011. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT FOR SALE DATED 16.06.2006. Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.1483/2011 DATED 15.03.2011 Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN EA 72/2016 IN E.P.27/2015 IN O.P.NO.222/2011 OF THE FAMILY COURT, OTTAPPALAM. Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 02.09.2021 IN E.A.72/2016 IN E.P.NO.27/2015 IN O.P.NO.222/2011 OF THE FAMILY COURT, OTTAPALAM.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial