Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shajahan vs State of Kerala

Shajahan vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 22, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1379039

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./6504/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shajahan

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice ziyad rahman a.a. tuesday, the 22nd day of august 2023 / 31st sravana, 1945 bail appl. no. 6504 of 2023 crime no. 12 of the 2023 of the malappuram e.e. malappuram petitioner: shajahan aged 36 years s/o aboobacker, chavadiparambil house, karippol p.o., kaattipparuthi, malappuram, pin - 676552by advs. reghu sreedharan jissmon a kuriakose respondent: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, pin - 682031 other present: adv. sreeja v - sr pp this bail application having come up for admission on 22.08.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: b.a. no.6504 of 2023orderdated this the 22nd day of august, 2023 the petitioner has approached this court as he apprehends arrest in connection with the investigation in or.no.12/2023 of excise enforcement and anti narcotic special squad, malappuram. the crime was registered for the offences punishable under sections 20(b)(ii)a and 22(c) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985.2. today, when the matter came up for consideration, thelearned public prosecutor upon instruction submitted that, the petitioner has not been arrayed as the accused in the aforesaid case. but, he was issued with a notice under section 41a of cr pc, as his statement is to be recorded in connection with the investigation of the said case. since it is reported that the petitioner has not arrayed as an accused, no orders in this application are necessary. therefore, this application is closed accordingly with above observations. sd/- ziyad rahman a.a, judge mtk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 31ST SRAVANA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 6504 OF 2023 CRIME NO. 12 OF THE 2023 OF THE MALAPPURAM E.E. MALAPPURAM PETITIONER: SHAJAHAN AGED 36 YEARS S/O ABOOBACKER, CHAVADIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KARIPPOL P.O., KAATTIPPARUTHI, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676552

BY ADVS. REGHU SREEDHARAN JISSMON A KURIAKOSE RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 OTHER PRESENT: ADV. SREEJA V - SR PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: B.A. No.6504 of 2023

ORDER

Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2023 The petitioner has approached this Court as he apprehends arrest in connection with the investigation in OR.No.12/2023 of Excise Enforcement and Anti Narcotic Special Squad, Malappuram. The crime was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)A and 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

2. Today, when the matter came up for consideration, the

learned Public Prosecutor upon instruction submitted that, the petitioner has not been arrayed as the accused in the aforesaid case. But, he was issued with a notice under Section 41A of Cr PC, as his statement is to be recorded in connection with the investigation of the said case. Since it is reported that the petitioner has not arrayed as an accused, no orders in this application are necessary. Therefore, this application is closed accordingly with above observations. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A, JUDGE mtk

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial