Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abdul Salam vs the Additional District Magistrate, Malappuram,

Abdul Salam vs The Additional District Magistrate, Malappuram,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Aug 01, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1378878

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/25078/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abdul Salam

Respondent

The Additional District Magistrate, Malappuram,

Excerpt

.....building therein within the jurisdiction of 5 th respondent grama panchayat. he states that the kerala state electricity board is taking steps to install a transformer abutting his property posing danger to the inmates of his house. therefore, he preferred exts.p2 and p3 representations before respondents 3 and 4 respectively. however, no action has been taken thereon and the kseb is proceeding with the installation of the transformer. accordingly, the petitioner has approached this court for a direction to respondents 2 to 5 not to install the transformer abutting the residential house of the petitioner.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the electricity board.3. the learned standing counsel for the kseb, oninstructions, submits that the installation of the transformer is already over and what remains is only energizing the same. it is further submitted that the transformer is installed in the property surrendered to the panchayat by one sharafudheen. since ext.p3 representation is pending before the 4 th respondent, there will be a direction to the 4 th respondent to consider the same after hearing the petitioner and the secretary of the panchayat concerned and any other affected persons within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. in case, the 4th respondent finds that the complaint of the petitioner is genuine, necessary steps to relocate the transformer shall be taken. the writ petition is disposed of as above. sd/- murali purushothaman judge al/- appendix of wp(c) 25078/2023 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 the true copy of basic tax receipt issued by the peruvallur village dated 27.11.2021 exhibit p2 the true copy of the representation filed by the petitioner before the 3rd exhibit p3 the true copy of the representation filed by the petitioner before the 4th

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 10TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 25078 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: ABDUL SALAM AGED 52 YEARS S/O. AVARAN, CHERANCHIRI HOUSE, SIDDIKKABAD,PERUVALLUR P.O., TIRURANGADI TALUK,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673638 BY ADV C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENTS: 1 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,

MALAPPURAM, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, UP HILL, MALAPPURAM P.O., PIN - 676505 2 KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN., PIN - 695004 3 THE DIVISIONAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB OFFICE, VENNIYUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676508 4 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB OFFICE, KUNNUMPURAM, KUNNUMPURAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676305 5 PERUVALLUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PANCHAYATH OFFICE, PARAMBILPEEDIKA, PERUVALLUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 676317

BY SMT.PARVATHY - G.P. BY SRI. A ARUNKUMAR - SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.

--------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.25078 of 2023 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of August, 2023

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the owner of 4.5 cents of land and a residential building therein within the jurisdiction of 5 th respondent Grama Panchayat. He states that the Kerala State Electricity Board is taking steps to install a transformer abutting his property posing danger to the inmates of his house. Therefore, he preferred Exts.P2 and P3 representations before respondents 3 and 4 respectively. However, no action has been taken thereon and the KSEB is proceeding with the installation of the transformer. Accordingly, the petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to respondents 2 to 5 not to install the transformer abutting the residential house of the petitioner.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the Electricity Board.

3. The learned Standing counsel for the KSEB, on

instructions, submits that the installation of the transformer is already over and what remains is only energizing the same. It is further submitted that the transformer is installed in the property surrendered to the Panchayat by one Sharafudheen. Since Ext.P3 representation is pending before the 4 th respondent, there will be a direction to the 4 th respondent to consider the same after hearing the petitioner and the Secretary of the Panchayat concerned and any other affected persons within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. In case, the 4th respondent finds that the complaint of the petitioner is genuine, necessary steps to relocate the transformer shall be taken. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE al/- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25078/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE PERUVALLUR VILLAGE DATED 27.11.2021 Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial