Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nebula Electricals vs State of Kerala

Nebula Electricals vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Aug 04, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1377909

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/24653/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nebula Electricals

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government pleader.4. after hearing both sides, i am of the consideredopinion that this writ petition itself can be disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider ext.p5 within a time frame with notice to the petitioner. therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions.1) the 2nd respondent is directed to consider ext.p5 and pass appropriate orders in it, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and if there is no other legal impediment, the security deposit shall be released to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.2) the petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance.sd/- judge bng appendix of wp(c) 24653/2023 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the work order dated 24.02.2016 exhibit p2 true copy of the contract dated 25.05.2016 exhibit p3 true copy of chalan dated 19.03.2016 exhibit p4 true copy of the letter dated 11.01.2022 exhibit p5 true copy of the application dated 07.12.2022 exhibit p6 true copy of the legal notice dated 01.03.2023

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 13TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 24653 OF 2023 PETITIONER: NEBULA ELECTRICALS 'A' GRADE EHT ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS & CONSULTANT ENGINEERS C-18,INDUSTRIAL ESTATE ,ETTUMANOOR,KOTTAYAM,REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER K.J.RAJU, PIN - 686631 BY ADV H.RAMANAN RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REP BY SECRETARY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 THE CHIEF ELECTRICAL ENGINEER OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTRICAL ENGINEER PWD(BUILDINGS)ELECTRICAL WING THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN -

OTHER PRESENT: SMT. VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: --------------------- --------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of August, 2023

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “1) Direct the respondents and more especially the 2nd respondent, to release the Security Deposit as requested by Ext P-5 forthwith and 2) Pass such other orders deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” (SIC)

2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the Security Deposit paid by the petitioner is not released by the 2nd respondent even though the work is over in the year

2019. The petitioner already filed Ext.P5 before the 2 nd respondent. The same is also not considered is the grievance.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I am of the considered

opinion that this writ petition itself can be disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P5 within a time frame with notice to the petitioner. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions.

1) The 2nd respondent is directed to consider Ext.P5 and pass appropriate orders in it, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and if there is no other legal impediment, the Security Deposit shall be released to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2) The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance.

Sd/- JUDGE bng APPENDIX OF WP(C) 24653/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE WORK ORDER DATED 24.02.2016 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CONTRACT DATED 25.05.2016 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF CHALAN DATED 19.03.2016 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 11.01.2022 Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 07.12.2022 Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE LEGAL NOTICE DATED 01.03.2023

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial