Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Karthyayaniamma vs the Additional District Magistrate

Karthyayaniamma vs The Additional District Magistrate

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 30, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1377496

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/11449/2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Karthyayaniamma

Respondent

The Additional District Magistrate

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice shoba annamma eapen thursday, the 30th day of november 2023 / 9th agrahayana, petitioner: karthyayaniamma, aged 80 years, w/o raman ezhuthachan, puttilottil house, mulanjoor, ottapalam taluk, palakkad district sri.g.sreekumar (chelur) sri.k.ravi pariyarath respondents: 1 the additional district magistrate palakkad 2 the assistant executive engineer kseb sub division, shornur, palakkad 678 001 3 a. sivaprakasan, president, mulanjoor kundil padasekhara samithi reg no 854/90, mulanjoor p.o, palakkad district 678 001 sri.asok m.cherian,sc,calicut uniersity sri.anith james sri.asok m.cheriansccalicut uniersity sri.t.v.varghese sri.varghese k.paul adv. smt. vinitha b sr gp this writ petition (civil) having been finally heard on 30.11.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..2..j u d g m e n tthe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- shoba annamma eapen judge pr ..3.. appendix of wp(c) 11449/2012 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 a true copy of the communication from the office of the assitant engineer, electrical section, ottapalam dated exhibit p2 a true copy of the objection of the petitioner dated 6/11/09 exhibit p3 a true copy of the consent for property crossing given by the petitioner dated nil exhibit p4 a true copy of the order passed by the first respondent dated 25/4/2012

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, PETITIONER: KARTHYAYANIAMMA, AGED 80 YEARS, W/O RAMAN EZHUTHACHAN, PUTTILOTTIL HOUSE, MULANJOOR, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI PARIYARATH RESPONDENTS: 1 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE PALAKKAD 2 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KSEB SUB DIVISION, SHORNUR, PALAKKAD 678 001 3 A. SIVAPRAKASAN, PRESIDENT, MULANJOOR KUNDIL PADASEKHARA SAMITHI REG NO 854/90, MULANJOOR P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678 001 SRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN,SC,CALICUT UNIERSITY SRI.ANITH JAMES SRI.ASOK M.CHERIANSCCALICUT UNIERSITY SRI.T.V.VARGHESE SRI.VARGHESE K.PAUL ADV. SMT. VINITHA B SR GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGE PR ..3.. APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11449/2012 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION FROM THE OFFICE OF THE ASSITANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, OTTAPALAM DATED EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 6/11/09 EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT FOR PROPERTY CROSSING GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER DATED NIL EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 25/4/2012

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial