Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manoj Joseph vs the State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority (Seiaa)

Manoj Joseph vs The State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority (Seiaa)

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 30, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1376608

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/6956/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manoj Joseph

Respondent

The State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority (Seiaa)

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice anu sivaraman friday, the 30th day of june 2023 / 9th ashadha, 1945 wp(c) no. 6956 of 2014 petitioner: manoj joseph aged 47 years s/o.late p.v.joseph, palockaran house p.o., kuriyachira, thrissur dt. by advs. sri.b.v.joy sanker sri.pramji paul vazhappilly respondents:1 the state level environment impact assessment authority pallimukku, pettah, thiruvananthapuram-695024 represented by member secretary. 2 member secretary state level environment impact assessment authority pallimukku, pettah, thiruvananthapuram-695024. 3 the district collector civil station, thrissur-680001. 4 the tahsildar thrissur taluk, thrissur-680011. smt.deepa narayanan, sr.gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on30.06.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 30th day of june, 2023 this writ petition was filed seeking directions to consider the application submitted by the petitioner for environmental clearance.2. it is submitted by the government pleader, on instructions, thatthe environment clearance had been granted by the seac in its 28 th meeting held on 25th and 26th of april, 2014. in the above view of the matter, the prayers raised in the writ petition have become infructuous. this writ petition is, accordingly, closed as infructuous. sd/- anu sivaraman judge np appendix of wp(c) 6956/2014 petitioner’s exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the application submitted by the petitioner dated 15.01.2014 before the 1st respondent. exhibit p2 true copy of the application submitted by sri.v.m.aneefa before the 3rd respondent. respondents’ exhibits: nil

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 9TH ASHADHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 6956 OF 2014 PETITIONER: MANOJ JOSEPH AGED 47 YEARS S/O.LATE P.V.JOSEPH, PALOCKARAN HOUSE P.O., KURIYACHIRA, THRISSUR DT. BY ADVS. SRI.B.V.JOY SANKER SRI.PRAMJI PAUL VAZHAPPILLY RESPONDENTS:

1 THE STATE LEVEL ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY PALLIMUKKU, PETTAH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695024 REPRESENTED BY MEMBER SECRETARY. 2 MEMBER SECRETARY STATE LEVEL ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY PALLIMUKKU, PETTAH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695024. 3 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CIVIL STATION, THRISSUR-680001. 4 THE TAHSILDAR THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR-680011. SMT.DEEPA NARAYANAN, SR.GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

30.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 30th day of June, 2023 This writ petition was filed seeking directions to consider the application submitted by the petitioner for Environmental Clearance.

2. It is submitted by the Government Pleader, on instructions, that

the Environment Clearance had been granted by the SEAC in its 28 th meeting held on 25th and 26th of April, 2014. In the above view of the matter, the prayers raised in the writ petition have become infructuous. This writ petition is, accordingly, closed as infructuous. Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE NP APPENDIX OF WP(C) 6956/2014 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 15.01.2014 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY SRI.V.M.ANEEFA BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS’ EXHIBITS: NIL

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial