Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shereef vs State of Kerala

Shereef vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 31, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1375118

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./5916/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shereef

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....station, thrissur which was registered for the offences punishable under sections 342, 436 and 307 of the indian penal code.3. the prosecution case is that, on 02.02.2023 at 02.00hours, the accused set fire to the ceiling of the house of the defacto complainant and his mother, and thereby committed the offences. the defacto complainant is none other than the son of the petitioner.4. the crime was registered in such circumstances, andas part of the investigation, the petitioner was arrested on 03.06.2023. since then, the petitioner has been under judicial detention. this application for regular bail was submitted in such circumstances.5. heard sri. karthik rajagopal, learned counsel b.a.no.5916/2023 3 appearing for the petitioner and sri. c.s. hrithwik, the learned senior public prosecutor appearing for the state.6. i have carefully gone through the records. it is truethat there are certain allegations and materials against the petitioner. however, it is a fact that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 03.06.2023. no criminal antecedents of the petitioner has also been brought to my notice. there is substantial progress in the investigation.7. in such circumstances, when taking note of the periodof detention the petitioner has undergone, and the stage of investigation, i do not find any necessity of further incarceration. accordingly, this bail application is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to the following conditions:(i) the petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for rs. 1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court.(ii) the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation. b.a.no.5916/2023 4(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m on every wednesday until the filing of final report.(iv) the petitioner shall also appear before the investigating.....

Full Judgment

B.A.No.5916/2023 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2023 / 9TH SRAVANA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 5916 OF 2023 CRIME NO. 90/2023 OF VADAKKEKAD POLICE STATION, THRISSUR PETITIONER: SHEREEF AGED 64 YEARS S/O MUHAMMADALI, PATTATHUVALAPPIL HOUSE, AGALAD DESOM AND P.O., PUNNAYOOR VILLAGE,CHAVKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR, PIN - 680518 BY ADVS. SANTHOSH MATHEW KARTHIK RAJAGOPAL ARUN THOMAS ANIL SEBASTIAN PULICKEL VEENA RAVEENDRAN ABI BENNY AREECKAL MATHEW NEVIN THOMAS KURIAN ANTONY MATHEW

RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 BY SRI. C. S. HRITHWIK, SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.No.5916/2023 2

ORDER

This is an application filed u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.90 of 2023 of Vadakkekad Police Station, Thrissur which was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 436 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case is that, on 02.02.2023 at 02.00

hours, the accused set fire to the ceiling of the house of the defacto complainant and his mother, and thereby committed the offences. The defacto complainant is none other than the son of the petitioner.

4. The crime was registered in such circumstances, and

as part of the investigation, the petitioner was arrested on 03.06.2023. Since then, the petitioner has been under judicial detention. This application for regular bail was submitted in such circumstances.

5. Heard Sri. Karthik Rajagopal, learned counsel B.A.No.5916/2023 3 appearing for the petitioner and Sri. C.S. Hrithwik, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

6. I have carefully gone through the records. It is true

that there are certain allegations and materials against the petitioner. However, it is a fact that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 03.06.2023. No criminal antecedents of the petitioner has also been brought to my notice. There is substantial progress in the investigation.

7. In such circumstances, when taking note of the period

of detention the petitioner has undergone, and the stage of investigation, I do not find any necessity of further incarceration. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation. B.A.No.5916/2023 4

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m on every Wednesday until the filing of final report.

(iv) The petitioner shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(v) The petitioner shall not commit any offence of similar nature while on bail.

(vi) The petitioner shall not make any attempt

to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vii) The petitioner shall not leave India without the permission of the trial Court. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE DCS/31.07.2023

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial