Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

George Paul vs State of Kerala

George Paul vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Aug 02, 2023
~6 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1374836

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/611/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

George Paul

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....district judge-viii, ernakulam in a.s.no.63/2015 arising from thejudgment dated 01.04.2015 in o.s.no.429/2015 by the iind additionalmunsiff court, ernakulam appellants/lrs of 1st appellant/1st plaintiff: 1 george paul aged 65 years s/o. late george nilavareth, nilavareth house., p.c road, kaloor, kochi 682 017 2 regeena jose aged 62 years d/o. late george nilavareth, karuthedath, chovvara, ernakulam dist 683571 3 betsy pappachan aged 59 years d/o. late george nilavareth, kottoor house, udayamperoor p.o, ernakulam dist 682 307 4 elby andrews aged 55 years d/o. late george nilavareth, edayalil house, aluva 683108 5 sony george, aged 51 years s/o. late george nilavareth., nilavareth house, p.c road, kaloor, kochi 682 017 6 jenson george aged 46 years s/o. late george nilavareth, nilavareth house, p.c road, kaloor, kochi 682 017 by advs. k.sandesh raja shankar v. respondents/respondents/appellants 2 to 5/ plaintiffs 2 to 5: 1 state of kerala represented by the principal secretary, land revenue department, government secretariat, thiruvananthapuram 695 001 2 the district collector, ernakulam collectorate, kakkanad, kochi 682 030 3 the special tahasildar (la) no. 1 kochi metro rail project, civil station , kakkanad , kochi 682 030 4 kochi metro rail corporation ltd represented by its managing director, revenue tower, kochi 682 0115 mohammed ali, (deleted) s/o.aboobacker haji,aged 71 years,seiko,kolparambil house,chackalapadom road,kaloor,kochi-682 017, elamkulam village,kanayannur taluk. 6 yousiff ali, (deleted) s/o.aboobacker haji,aged 78 years,seiko,kolparambil house,chackalapadom road,kaloor,kochi-682 017, elamkulam village,kanayannur taluk. 7 hussainkutty, (deleted) s/o.aboobacker haji,aged 73 years,seiko,kolparambil house,chackalapadom road,kaloor,kochi-682 017, elamkulam village,kanayannur taluk. 8 n.a.abdul rehaman, (deleted) s/o.aboobacker,aged 73, residing at namboodhirimadathil, freedom road,kaloor, deshabhimani, kochi-682 017. (respondents 5 to 8 are.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1945 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.03.2019 PASSED BY THE ADDITITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE-VIII, ERNAKULAM IN A.S.NO.63/2015 ARISING FROM THE

JUDGMENT DATED 01.04.2015 IN O.S.NO.429/2015 BY THE IInd ADDITIONAL

MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM APPELLANTS/LRs OF 1ST APPELLANT/1ST PLAINTIFF: 1 GEORGE PAUL AGED 65 YEARS S/O. LATE GEORGE NILAVARETH, NILAVARETH HOUSE., P.C ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI 682 017 2 REGEENA JOSE AGED 62 YEARS D/O. LATE GEORGE NILAVARETH, KARUTHEDATH, CHOVVARA, ERNAKULAM DIST 683571 3 BETSY PAPPACHAN AGED 59 YEARS D/O. LATE GEORGE NILAVARETH, KOTTOOR HOUSE, UDAYAMPEROOR P.O, ERNAKULAM DIST 682 307 4 ELBY ANDREWS AGED 55 YEARS D/O. LATE GEORGE NILAVARETH, EDAYALIL HOUSE, ALUVA 683108 5 SONY GEORGE, AGED 51 YEARS S/O. LATE GEORGE NILAVARETH., NILAVARETH HOUSE, P.C ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI 682 017 6 JENSON GEORGE AGED 46 YEARS S/O. LATE GEORGE NILAVARETH, NILAVARETH HOUSE, P.C ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI 682 017 BY ADVS. K.SANDESH RAJA SHANKAR V. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS 2 TO 5/ PLAINTIFFS 2 TO 5: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, KOCHI 682 030 3 THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR (LA) NO. 1 KOCHI METRO RAIL PROJECT, CIVIL STATION , KAKKANAD , KOCHI 682 030 4 KOCHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, REVENUE TOWER, KOCHI 682 011

5 MOHAMMED ALI, (DELETED) S/O.ABOOBACKER HAJI,AGED 71 YEARS,SEIKO,KOLPARAMBIL HOUSE,CHACKALAPADOM ROAD,KALOOR,KOCHI-682 017, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE,KANAYANNUR TALUK. 6 YOUSIFF ALI, (DELETED) S/O.ABOOBACKER HAJI,AGED 78 YEARS,SEIKO,KOLPARAMBIL HOUSE,CHACKALAPADOM ROAD,KALOOR,KOCHI-682 017, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE,KANAYANNUR TALUK. 7 HUSSAINKUTTY, (DELETED) S/O.ABOOBACKER HAJI,AGED 73 YEARS,SEIKO,KOLPARAMBIL HOUSE,CHACKALAPADOM ROAD,KALOOR,KOCHI-682 017, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE,KANAYANNUR TALUK. 8 N.A.ABDUL REHAMAN, (DELETED) S/O.ABOOBACKER,AGED 73, RESIDING AT NAMBOODHIRIMADATHIL, FREEDOM ROAD,KALOOR, DESHABHIMANI, KOCHI-682 017. (RESPONDENTS 5 TO 8 ARE DELETED FROM PARTY ARRAY AS PER

ORDER DATED 08.10.2021 IN IA.2/2021.)

BY ADVS. MANU VYASAN PETER - R4 P.B.KRISHNAN(K/1193/1994)- R4 P.B.SUBRAMANYAN(K/1145/2009)- R4 SABU GEORGE(K/000711/1998)- R4

SMT. K. B. SONY. GP. SRI. JAJU BABU, SR. SMT. M.U. VIJAYALAKSHMI, SC. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T. R.RAVI ,J. --- ---- RSA No. 611 of2021 - -- Dat ed t hist he02nd dayofAugust ,2023 J UDGM ENT The appeal i s fil ed by t iff agai nst t he di smi ssal of a sui t on t he gr ound t hat i t i s not mai nabl e.Thefir stappel lat eCour thasal soconfirmed t hedeci sion.Thesui tisfil edpr ayi ngf oradecl arat iont hat t hepl iff sar ein excl usi vepossessi on and enj oymentof t aint schedul e pr ties and t o pass a decr ee of per manent pr ohi bit ory i njunct ion r est rai ning t he def endant sfr om t aki ng possessi on oft aintschedul e pr ties wi thout gi ving pr oper not ice and wi thout ascer tai ning t he act ualext entofl and i n possessi on and enj oymentoft iff sand f orot herr eli efs.I tcan be seen f rom t he r eli efspr ayed f ort hatt he pet iti oneri snot chal lengi ng any acqui sit ion pr ngs as such i nthe sui t. The gr ievance appear sto be t hat t he pr ties whi ch wer e i n t hei r possessi on wer e bei ng t aken possessi on of even wi thout any pr ngs f or acqui sit ion. 2.Thi sCour thad di rect ed t he St andi ng Counself or t heKochiMet roRai lCor por ati on t ogeti nst ruct ionsast o whet her t hey have t aken possessi on of t he l and i n Sy 1 whi ch accor ding t othe appel lanti s pr ivat e pr tyand not' pur amboke' .The counselon i nst ruct ion submi tst hatt her ehasbeennopr ngsf oracqui sit ion andal lthathasbeent akenpossessi onofi sthel andwhi ch hadbeensurr ender edbyt heappel lant ,asadmi ttedi nthe pl . A commi ssi on had been t aken out bef ore t he appel lat e Cour tand t he Commi ssi onerhasfil ed a r epor t showi ng por tionsbel ongi ng t otheappel lant son t hebasi s oft he t itl e deeds,whi ch have been t aken possessi on of . However ,the r epor t shows t he sur vey number s as di ffer ent f rom Sy 1.I tis not cl ear whet her t he sur vey number s ar e number s al lot ted af ter t aki ng possessi on, by subdi vidi ng Sy

1. Those ar

e al l mat ter swhi chmayr equi ret aki ngoff urt herevi dence.The t rial Cour t as wel l as t he fir st appel lat e Cour t have pr oceeded on t he basi sthat t he chal lenge i s agai nst acqui sit ionandi tisont hatbasi stheCour thasf oundt hat t he sui tis notmai nabl e. The or deroft he appel lat e taswel last het rialCour tcannotbesust ained si nce t hequest ionofmai nabi li tydoesnotar iseatt hisst age, ast her eisnopr ayeragai nstacqui sit ion.Thecont ent ioni s onl ythatt hepr tiesbel ongi ngt otheappel lant scanbe t aken onl yon t hebasi sofpr ngsi nit iat ed undert he LandAcqui sit ion Act . 3.Rel iancei spl acedonaDi visi onBenchj udgmentof t his Cour tin Keral a St ate Housi ng Board, Tvm v. R. Omana and Ot hers[ 2017 ( 2)KHC 50],wher eint his t had hel dthat i mpl ied bar ofj uri sdi cti on ofCi vil ttot akecogni zancewoul d appl yonl yfordi sput esi n r elat iont omeasur ementandmar kingoft heboundar iesof t he l and pr oposed t o be acqui red undert he Actand t hat t hel andpr oposedt obeacqui redcanobvi ousl ybet heone f orwhi ch a not ificat ion underSect ion 4 oft he Actand a decl arat ion underSect ion 9 oft he Actwer e publ ished as perl aw.The si tuat ion i nthi s case i s notone wher ethe measur ement and mar king of boundar ies of t he l and pr oposed t o be acqui red i schal lenged.The case i tsel fis t hatt her eisnopr oposalt oacqui re,whi ch i saf actwhi ch hasbeen admi tted by t he KMRL,when t hey submi tthat t her e i s no not ificat ion f or acqui sit ion of l and f rom Sy 1. I nthe above ci rcumst ances,t his appeali s al lowed. The j udgment s oft he t rialCour tand t he fir stappel lat e tar e setasi de.The mat teri sremanded back t othe t rialCour tforconsi der ati onoft hepr ayer sint hesui t.The sui tishel dtobemai nabl e. Sd/ - T. R.RAVI J UDGE sn

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial