Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajith Kumar vs the State of Kerala

Ajith Kumar vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 05, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1374576

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/2962/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajith Kumar

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice shoba annamma eapen wednesday, the 5th day of july 2023 / 14th ashadha, 1945 petitioner/s: 1 ajith kumar, aged 49 years s/o.vinayakan, nairessery house,nadavarambu p.o., irinjalakkuda. 2 amit.vinayak, aged 17 years s/o.ajith kumar, nairessery house,nadavarambu p.o., irinjalakkuda by adv sri.r.manoj respondent/s:1 the state of kerala, represented by the secretary, department ofhigher education, state secretariat,thiruvananthapuram. pin - 695 001. 2 the commissioner of entrance examination housing board buildings, thiruvananthapuram.pin - 695 001. 3 the tahsildar taluk office mukundapuram, irinjalakuda, pin - 680 121. 4 the village officer nadavarambu irinjalakuda. pin - 680 121. 5 the village officer velloorkkara thrissur. pin - 680001. senior gp - smt.mary beena josephthis writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 05.07.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..2..judgmentthe writ petition is filed seeking for a direction to the third respondent to issue the caste certificate to the petitioners on the basis of exts.p2 to p4. on 04.07.20123, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioners. today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. the writ petition is filed in the year, 2016. by passage of time, the petitioners might have lost interest in prosecuting the matter. hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- shoba annamma eapen judge bka/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 14TH ASHADHA, 1945 PETITIONER/S: 1 AJITH KUMAR, AGED 49 YEARS S/O.VINAYAKAN, NAIRESSERY HOUSE,NADAVARAMBU P.O., IRINJALAKKUDA. 2 AMIT.VINAYAK, AGED 17 YEARS S/O.AJITH KUMAR, NAIRESSERY HOUSE,NADAVARAMBU P.O., IRINJALAKKUDA BY ADV SRI.R.MANOJ RESPONDENT/S:

1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OFHIGHER EDUCATION, STATE SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN - 695 001. 2 THE COMMISSIONER OF ENTRANCE EXAMINATION HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN - 695 001. 3 THE TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE MUKUNDAPURAM, IRINJALAKUDA, PIN - 680 121. 4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER NADAVARAMBU IRINJALAKUDA. PIN - 680 121. 5 THE VILLAGE OFFICER VELLOORKKARA THRISSUR. PIN - 680001. SENIOR GP - SMT.MARY BEENA JOSEPH

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed seeking for a direction to the third respondent to issue the caste certificate to the petitioners on the basis of Exts.P2 to P4. On 04.07.20123, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioners. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. The writ petition is filed in the year, 2016. By passage of time, the petitioners might have lost interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGE bka/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial