Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sheela vs N.Sivan

Sheela vs N.Sivan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 31, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1374426

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/1556/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sheela

Respondent

N.Sivan

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice ziyad rahman a.a. monday, the 31st day of july 2023 / 9th sravana, 1945judgment dated 27.03.2023 in wp(c) 4044/2023 of high court ofkerala petitioner/writ petitioner: sheela aged 52 years w/o late mohanan, arackal house, annamanada desom, kallur thekkumuri village, annamanada p.o, chalakkudy taluk, thrissur district, pin - 680741 by advs. anand kalyanakrishnan c.dheeraj rajan respondent/1st respondent: n.sivan age not known to the petitioner, father's name not known to the petitioner, secretary, road transport authority, chalakkudy, sub regional transport office, mini civil station, chalakkudy, thrissur district, pin - 680307 by adv adv c.s. hrithwik - sr.public prosecutor this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 31.07.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe contempt of court case was submitted alleging non compliance of the judgment passed by this court. the writ petition was disposed of by this court directing the 1 st respondent to take a decision on ext.p8 application after hearing the parties within a period of one month from the date of production copy of thisjudgment.today when the matter came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned government pleader submitted that the hearing is over and the orders were passed in pursuance to the same and thus, the direction in the judgment has been complied with. in such circumstances, nothing survives in this contempt of court case and it is closed recording the above submission. sd/- ziyad rahman a.a. judge scs appendix of con.case(c) 1556/2023 petitioner annexures annexure a certified copy of the judgment dated 27.03.2023 passed by this hon'ble court in wpc no. 4044/2023

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2023 / 9TH SRAVANA, 1945

JUDGMENT DATED 27.03.2023 IN WP(C) 4044/2023 OF HIGH COURT OF

KERALA PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER: SHEELA AGED 52 YEARS W/O LATE MOHANAN, ARACKAL HOUSE, ANNAMANADA DESOM, KALLUR THEKKUMURI VILLAGE, ANNAMANADA P.O, CHALAKKUDY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680741 BY ADVS. ANAND KALYANAKRISHNAN C.DHEERAJ RAJAN RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT: N.SIVAN AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, ROAD TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHALAKKUDY, SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680307 BY ADV ADV C.S. HRITHWIK - SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The Contempt of Court Case was submitted alleging non compliance of the judgment passed by this Court. The Writ Petition was disposed of by this Court directing the 1 st respondent to take a decision on Ext.P8 application after hearing the parties within a period of one month from the date of production copy of this

judgment.

Today when the matter came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader submitted that the hearing is over and the orders were passed in pursuance to the same and thus, the direction in the judgment has been complied with. In such circumstances, nothing survives in this Contempt of Court Case and it is closed recording the above submission. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE scs APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1556/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.03.2023 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO. 4044/2023

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial