Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sam Kumar vs State of Kerala

Sam Kumar vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 02, 2023
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1374234

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./5764/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sam Kumar

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....bail application having come up for admission on 02.08.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:orderthe petitioner is the accused in crime no.1119/2022 of yeroor police station. the offence alleged against the petitioner are under section 302 read with section 34 of ipc.2. the prosecution case is that on 22.12.2021 at about 6.30p.m. the petitioner committed murder of his wife in his house and thereby committed the offences. the crime was registered in such circumstances and as part of the investigation the petitioner was arrested on 23.12.2021 and since then the petitioner has been in judicial custody. this application for regular bail is submitted in such circumstances.3. heard sri.r.n.sandeep, learned counsel for the petitioner and smt.sreeja v., learned public prosecutor for the state.4. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent of all the allegations. he also submits that now more than 500 days have been over since the date of his arrest and there is no purpose in keeping the petitioner under detention.5. on the other hand, the learned public prosecutoropposes the said application by pointing out that, wife of the deceased was brutally murdered and as per the post mortem report 50 ante-mortem injuries were there on the body of the victim. besides the same, the petitioner was also involved in crime no.818/2021 of yeroor police station under section 75 of juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2015, for assaulting his own children. the crucial witnesses are the two children of the petitioner, aged 15 and 12 years and the chances of influencing and intimidating the victims cannot be ruled out, if the petitioner is released on bail. dismissal of the application was sought in such circumstances.6. earlier, when the matter came up for consideration, thiscourt directed the learned sessions judge before whom the matter is pending as s.c. no.1326/2022, as to the probable time required for.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1945 CRIME NO.1119/2022 OF YEROOR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT PETITIONER/ACCUSED: SAM KUMAR AGED 40 YEARS S/O SASIDHARAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT SYAM VILASAM, EDAKOCHI, VILAKKUPARA, AYIRANELLOOR, KOLLAM, PIN - 690538 BY ADVS. R.N.SANDEEP B.MUHAMMED SHAHEEL KEERTHI VIJAYAN RESPONDENTS/STATE: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YEROOR POLICE STATION YEROOR P.O, KOLLAM, PIN - 691312 BY ADV ADV. SREEJA V - SR PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1119/2022 of Yeroor Police Station. The offence alleged against the petitioner are under Section 302 read with Section 34 of IPC.

2. The prosecution case is that on 22.12.2021 at about 6.30

p.m. the petitioner committed murder of his wife in his house and thereby committed the offences. The crime was registered in such circumstances and as part of the investigation the petitioner was arrested on 23.12.2021 and since then the petitioner has been in judicial custody. This application for regular bail is submitted in such circumstances.

3. Heard Sri.R.N.Sandeep, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Sreeja V., learned Public Prosecutor for the State.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent of all the allegations. He also submits that now more than 500 days have been over since the date of his arrest and there is no purpose in keeping the petitioner under detention.

5. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor

opposes the said application by pointing out that, wife of the deceased was brutally murdered and as per the post mortem report 50 ante-mortem injuries were there on the body of the victim. Besides the same, the petitioner was also involved in Crime No.818/2021 of Yeroor Police Station under Section 75 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, for assaulting his own children. The crucial witnesses are the two children of the petitioner, aged 15 and 12 years and the chances of influencing and intimidating the victims cannot be ruled out, if the petitioner is released on bail. Dismissal of the application was sought in such circumstances.

6. Earlier, when the matter came up for consideration, this

Court directed the learned Sessions Judge before whom the matter is pending as S.C. No.1326/2022, as to the probable time required for completing the trial under normal circumstances. In response to the same, a report dated 26.07.2023 has been placed on record, wherein it is mentioned that, the trial has not started, as the FSL is not received so far. It is reported that, the trial of the said case can be completed within a period of four months upon receipt of the FSL report.

7. I have carefully gone through the records. As rightly

pointed out by the learned Public Prosecutor this is a case in which the wife of the petitioner was murdered in a brutal manner. Yet another crime is also registered for assaulting the children of the petitioner who are crucial witnesses in this case. In such circumstances, I find some force in the apprehension voiced by the learned Public Prosecutor as to the possibility of intimidation and influence being exerted upon the witnesses, if the petitioner is released on bail. Thus, when taking note of the serious nature of allegations and the chances of influencing witnesses, I am of view that, this is not a fit case in which bail can be granted to the petitioner.

Therefore, I do not find any merit in this application. However, it is ordered that, every endeavour shall be taken by the learned Sessions Judge to complete the trial of the said case as expeditiously as possible. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE scs

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial