Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ummar vs Shereena

UMMAR vs Shereena

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 12, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1373524

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RPFC/181/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

UMMAR

Respondent

Shereena

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice v.g.arun wednesday, the 12th day of april 2023 / 22nd chaithra, rpfc no. 181 of 2021 mc 126/2015 of family court, ottappalam revision petitioner/s: ummar aged 56 years s/o hydrose, paranthodan house, p.o.pulamanthole, perinthalmanna taluk, malappuram district by advs. p.jayaram gigi pappachan respondent/s: 1 shereena aged 40 years d/o. akbar, cheruvasseri palliyalil house, p.o nellaya, ottapalam taluk, palakkad district- 679335. 2 fathima zera aged 6 years minor, d/o .ummer, cheruvasseri palliyalil house, p.o nellaya, ottapalam taluk, palakkad district-679335. (minor 2nd respondent represented by guardian/mother 1st respondent. by adv a.haroon rasheed this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 12.04.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: rp(fc) no.181 of 2021 -2-orderdated this the 12th day of april, 2023 it is informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that all matrimonial disputes, including the maintenance claim of the respondents, are settled. a copy of the settlement is produced as annexure a1. the revision petition is hence dismissed, based on the settlement. sd/- v.g.arun judge scl/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 22ND CHAITHRA, RPFC NO. 181 OF 2021 MC 126/2015 OF FAMILY COURT, OTTAPPALAM REVISION PETITIONER/S: UMMAR AGED 56 YEARS S/O HYDROSE, PARANTHODAN HOUSE, P.O.PULAMANTHOLE, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADVS. P.JAYARAM GIGI PAPPACHAN RESPONDENT/S: 1 SHEREENA AGED 40 YEARS D/O. AKBAR, CHERUVASSERI PALLIYALIL HOUSE, P.O NELLAYA, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT- 679335. 2 FATHIMA ZERA AGED 6 YEARS MINOR, D/O .UMMER, CHERUVASSERI PALLIYALIL HOUSE, P.O NELLAYA, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679335. (MINOR 2ND RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN/MOTHER 1ST RESPONDENT. BY ADV A.HAROON RASHEED THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.04.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RP(FC) No.181 of 2021 -2-

ORDER

Dated this the 12th day of April, 2023 It is informed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that all matrimonial disputes, including the maintenance claim of the respondents, are settled. A copy of the settlement is produced as Annexure A1. The revision petition is hence dismissed, based on the settlement. Sd/- V.G.ARUN JUDGE Scl/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial