Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chellamma, vs the Divisional Manager,

Chellamma, vs The Divisional Manager,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 24, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1372259

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RP/868/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chellamma,

Respondent

The Divisional Manager,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan monday, the 24th day of july 2023 / 2nd sravana, 1945 against the order/judgment in maca 3096/2015 of high court of kerala review petitioner/3rd appellant: chellamma, w/o. late gopalakrishna pillai, aged 65 years, residing now in a rented house, c/o. sreevidhya, kottarathil madathil, akam kudi p.o, haripad, pallipad, alapuzha district, kerala, pin 690 by adv g.harikrishnan (tripunithura) respondent/respondent/1st & 2nd appellant:1 the divisional manager, the oriental insurance co.ltd, divisional office, kollam 691 001 2 anjana @ anjana ravi, w/o. late ajith kumar, aged 34 years, sasi mandiram, chittayamcheri, panayam village, inchavila p.o, kollam. pin 691 001 3 kashinathan, s/o. late ajith kumar, aged 3 years, sasi mandiram, chittayam cherri, panayam village, inchavila p.o, kollam (minor represented by the 2nd respondent as his mother) pin 691 001 by advs. sri.pratheesh.p smt.s.seethathis review petition having come up for admission on 24.07.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:orderthe petitioner and the counsel remained absent. it is a review petition of the year 2019. it is against the award passed by this court in maca no. 3096 of 2015. as such, the absence of the counsel cannot be condoned. the learned standing counsel for the first respondent and the counsel for the respondents 2 and 3 are present and ready with the matter. hence, the review petition will stand dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge msp appendix of rp 868/2019 petitioner annexures annexure a1 a true copy of representation made by the petitioner dated 16/03/2019 annexure a2 a true copy of family membership certificate issued by village officer panayam dated annexure a3 a true copy of proceedings of the district collector alappuzha dated 1st respondent.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 2ND SRAVANA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN MACA 3096/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/3RD APPELLANT: CHELLAMMA, W/O. LATE GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI, AGED 65 YEARS, RESIDING NOW IN A RENTED HOUSE, C/O. SREEVIDHYA, KOTTARATHIL MADATHIL, AKAM KUDI P.O, HARIPAD, PALLIPAD, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN 690 BY ADV G.HARIKRISHNAN (TRIPUNITHURA) RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/1ST & 2ND APPELLANT:

1 THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, KOLLAM 691 001 2 ANJANA @ ANJANA RAVI, W/O. LATE AJITH KUMAR, AGED 34 YEARS, SASI MANDIRAM, CHITTAYAMCHERI, PANAYAM VILLAGE, INCHAVILA P.O, KOLLAM. PIN 691 001 3 KASHINATHAN, S/O. LATE AJITH KUMAR, AGED 3 YEARS, SASI MANDIRAM, CHITTAYAM CHERRI, PANAYAM VILLAGE, INCHAVILA P.O, KOLLAM (MINOR REPRESENTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS HIS MOTHER) PIN 691 001 BY ADVS. SRI.PRATHEESH.P SMT.S.SEETHA

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The petitioner and the counsel remained absent. It is a review petition of the year 2019. It is against the award passed by this Court in MACA No. 3096 of 2015. As such, the absence of the counsel cannot be condoned. The learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent and the counsel for the respondents 2 and 3 are present and ready with the matter. Hence, the review petition will stand dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE msp APPENDIX OF RP 868/2019 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 A TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER DATED 16/03/2019 ANNEXURE A2 A TRUE COPY OF FAMILY MEMBERSHIP CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICER PANAYAM DATED ANNEXURE A3 A TRUE COPY OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ALAPPUZHA DATED 1ST RESPONDENT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial