Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajit Kumar vs District Women and Child Development Officer

Ajit Kumar vs District Women and Child Development Officer

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 03, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1370802

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/21124/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajit Kumar

Respondent

District Women and Child Development Officer

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran thursday, the 3rd day of august 2023 / 12th sravana, 1945 petitioner: ajit kumar, aged 57 years, s/o.k.somasekharan nair, kamalam veettil, manganam p.o., kottayam - 686018. by advs. p.mohandas (ernakulam) k.sudhinkumar sabu pullan gokul d. sudhakaran r.bhaskara krishnan bharath mohan k.p.satheesan (sr.) respondents: 1 district women and child development officer, (convener, local level complaints committee), collectorate p.o., kottayam - 686002.2 reshma sreedharan, thazhath house, aymanam p.o., kottayam - 686015. smt.k.g.sarojini, gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 03.08.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: -2-judgmentafter arguing this matter for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one arraying proper parties. in the afore circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn with the afore requested liberty being reserved to the petitioner. sd/ devan ramachandran judge akv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 12TH SRAVANA, 1945 PETITIONER: AJIT KUMAR, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.K.SOMASEKHARAN NAIR, KAMALAM VEETTIL, MANGANAM P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686018. BY ADVS. P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) K.SUDHINKUMAR SABU PULLAN GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN BHARATH MOHAN K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.) RESPONDENTS: 1 DISTRICT WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, (CONVENER, LOCAL LEVEL COMPLAINTS COMMITTEE), COLLECTORATE P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686002.

2 RESHMA SREEDHARAN, THAZHATH HOUSE, AYMANAM P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686015. SMT.K.G.SAROJINI, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

JUDGMENT

After arguing this matter for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one arraying proper parties. In the afore circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn with the afore requested liberty being reserved to the petitioner. Sd/ DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE akv

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial